Abstract

Drugs are used in the adjuvant, metastatic, or both settings in cancer, but the rate, direction, and speed with which drugs are tested and indicated in each setting are unknown. To identify the number of unique agents that are currently category 1 or 2A per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines in metastatic and adjuvant settings of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer, and colon cancer, as well as the mean delay between use in these 2 settings and the quality of supporting evidence. This cross-sectional study used NCCN treatment guidelines current as of May 15, 2019, and the clinical trials cited either by these guidelines or within corresponding drug labels. Trials published between 1970 and 2019 were evaluated. The analysis included published clinical trials of systemic therapy options deemed by the NCCN as category 1 or 2A. Participants included patients with early or metastatic NSCLC, breast cancer, or colon cancer who were included in clinical trials evaluating current NCCN-recommended systemic therapy options. Data analysis was performed from March 2019 to May 2019. Systemic therapy regimens used as either adjuvant treatment or as therapy for metastatic disease in the 3 cancer types. Number of agents recommended for use in adjuvant and metastatic settings of NSCLC, colon cancer, and breast cancer, the mean delay between use in these 2 settings, and the percentage of agents supported by trials with substantial improvement in either progression-free survival (disease-free survival for adjuvant agents) or overall survival. This study identified 69 agents recommended for use in metastatic disease compared with 25 agents recommended for adjuvant use. For agents used in both settings, the mean (SD) delay between use in metastatic disease and as adjuvant therapy was 10.0 (7.5) years. On the basis of trials with positive outcomes, 39 of 69 agents (56.5%) were approved or recommended in the metastatic setting, compared with 23 of 25 agents (92.0%) approved for use as adjuvant therapy. There is a substantial difference in the number of agents available for use, as well as the timing of supporting evidence, in the metastatic and adjuvant settings for NSCLC, breast cancer, and colon cancer. Given the potential benefit of adjuvant therapy in these cancer types, further investigation into additional adjuvant systemic therapy options is warranted.

Highlights

  • Adjuvant therapy is the standard of care based on evidence of improved disease-free survival or overall survival in a number of clinical settings

  • There is a substantial difference in the number of agents available for use, as well as the timing of supporting evidence, in the metastatic and adjuvant settings for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer, and colon cancer

  • Meaning There is a substantial difference in the number of agents available for use, as well as the timing of supporting evidence, in the metastatic and adjuvant settings of non–small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and colon cancer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Adjuvant therapy is the standard of care based on evidence of improved disease-free survival or overall survival in a number of clinical settings. For early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), adjuvant treatment is supported by several large meta-analyses[1,2] demonstrating a 4% to 5% absolute increase in 5-year survival with the addition of systemic therapy following curative surgery. Adjuvant treatment with either endocrine therapy, anti-ERBB2 (formerly HER2/neu)–directed therapy, or chemotherapy is currently recommended for many patients with early-stage breast cancer on the basis of numerous randomized controlled trials and subsequent meta-analyses.[6]. Despite the potential for adjuvant therapy to offer benefit, in the aforementioned types of cancer, there have been fewer systemic therapy options added to the armamentarium for this setting when compared with metastatic disease. We sought to describe the degree of difference, as well as any patterns in evidence and experimentation for drug use in both settings, and to identify the number of unique agents that are currently used in metastatic and adjuvant settings

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.