Abstract
Two methods, based on dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) and Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged, and Safe (QuEChERS), have been developed, validated and critically compared in order to analyze the insecticide fipronil in honey by high performance liquid chromatography coupled with diode array detection. Parameters that affect the extraction have been investigated for both methods. In optimal conditions, the limits of quantification were 0.03 and 0.6 mg kg−1 for DLLME and modified QuEChERS, respectively. The relative recoveries were between 70.7–101.1% and 76.3–87.7% for DLLME and QuEChERS, with relative standard deviations in the range of 7.1–11.2% and 5.9–10.8%, respectively. Both methods were found to be simple, fast and inexpensive. By comparison with the modified QuEChERS, the advantages of the DLLME technique were the preconcentration factor and the lower amount of solvent. However, the modified QuEChERS method was demonstrated to be more robust and more suitable for the determination of pesticides in complex samples.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
