Comparison of Direct Anterior Approach and Posterolateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty in Elderly People Aged 75 Years or Older

A direct lateral approach to the hip is described which allows adequate access for orientation of the implant, for the insertion ofthe cement and for the correction ofdiscrepancy in leg length. An anatomical observation was made that the gluteus medius muscle is inserted into the greater trochanter by a tendon and that the axis of the shaft of the femur lies anterior to the main bulk of the muscle which was left

What's New in Hip Replacement.

Objective To systematically evaluate the clinical outcomes of direct anterior approach (DAA), supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip ( SuperPATH) approach (SPA) and posterolateral approach (PLA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the treatment of hip diseases. Methods All the randomized controlled trial ( RCT) articles and observational research articles about the curative effect of THA through SuperPATH approach ( SPA) and direct anterior approach (DAA) versus posterolateral approach (PLA) for treatment of hip diseases that published at home and abroad from database establishing to October 2018 were retrieved from PubMed, Excerpt Medica Database (EMbase), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) and other databases. Two researchers independently completed the article selection (excluding the comparison of THA without DAA, SPA and PLA, the total sample sizes were less than 30 cases, no mention of allocation method, blind method, non-Chinese or English literature), data extraction, and meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 and indirect treatment comparison (ITC) software after evaluating the methodological quality of articles based on Cochrane risk bias assessment tool. Results A total of 501 articles were initially detected, and six articles were included after strict screening, all of which were randomized controlled studies. A total of 478 subjects were included, including 241 in the experimental group and 237 in the control group. The meta-analysis results showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the incision length between the DAA and PLA [WMD= -1.30, 95%CI(-3.27, 0.67)]. The incision length in the SPA group was smaller than that in the PLA group [WMD=-7.07, 95%CI(-8.21, -5.93)]. There was no statistically significant difference in the operative time of THA in DAA [WMD=2.37, 95%CI(-30.19, 34.93)], SPA [WMD=12.26, 95%CI(-3.22, 27.74)] and PLA. There was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding volume between DAA and PLA in THA [WMD=-37.70, 95%CI(-91.14, 15.75)]. Intraoperative bleeding in the SPA group was less than that in the PLA group [WMD=-171.56, 95%CI(-252.92, -90.20)]. In the DAA group [WMD=7.10, 95%CI (5.54, 8.66)] and SPA group [WMD=5.80, 95%CI (0.10, 11.50)], the Harris hip function score one month after surgery was higher than that in the PLA group. Indirect comparison of correction: the incision length of the DAA group was smaller than that of the SPA group [MD=5.77, 95%CI(3.94, 8.046)]. There was no statistically significant difference in operative time between the two groups [MD=-9.89, 95%CI(-45.943, 26.163)]. Intraoperative blood loss in the DAA group was lower than that in the SPA group [MD=133.86, 95%CI(36.79, 230.93)]. There was no statistically significant difference in Harris hip function scores one month after surgery between the two groups [MD=1.3, 95%CI (-4.61, 7.21)]. Conclusions Among the three different approaches for the treatment of hip diseases, the hip function of DAA is better than PLA only after the operation. Other aspects may be related to the long DAA learning curve and the difficulty of proximal femur exposure, leading to no significant difference. The SPA is superior to the PLA in terms of incision length, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hip function. While DAA and SPA are indirectly compared using PLA as control, DAA shows advantages in terms of incision length and intraoperative blood loss, but its medium-and long-term clinical efficacy still needs further studies and confirmation of more high-quality articles. Key words: Arthroplasty, replacement, hip; Surgical procedures, operative; Meta-analysis

Comparison of Early Functional Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Direct Anterior or Posterolateral Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A Crossover Cohort of Direct Anterior vs Posterolateral Approach in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: What Does the Patient Prefer?

Primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures continue to increase. On the basis of data from 2000 to 2014, the frequency of THA in the U.S. is projected to grow to 635,000 procedures per year by 20301. The majority of implants from these procedures are expected to last >20 years. A study of 94,292 total hip replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Registry noted a survivorship of 58% at 25 years2. THA complications (especially periprosthetic joint infection [PJI] and dislocation), as well as perioperative management to optimize short stays and outpatient THA while minimizing perioperative complications, continue to draw heavy attention. Implant Design and Related Outcomes In a study evaluating 2016 data from the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) compared with other national registries, the authors found that cementless stem fixation combined with the use of ceramic and 36-mm heads was the current preference in the U.S., while other registries indicated that cemented implants and metal and 32-mm heads were most commonly used3. Cemented Versus Cementless Implants There is evidence that cemented implants outperform cementless counterparts in elderly patients when early complication rates are compared. On the basis of the recent Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) annual report, Tanzer et al. reported that, among patients >75 years of age who underwent THA, those treated with the best-performing cementless femoral stems had more early revisions (<30 days postoperatively) compared with those treated with the best-performing cemented implants4. These early revisions were mainly attributable to the risk of revision for fracture or loosening. This difference disappeared after 90 days following surgery4. Bearing Surfaces Metal-on-Polyethylene (MoP) Studies show better long-term survival with a metal-on-highly-cross-linked-polyethylene (HXLPE) articulation compared with metal-on-conventional, non-cross-linked polyethylene (CPE) in younger patients5-7. In a retrospective review of 101 hips in 84 patients ≤50 years of age, with a duration of follow-up of 15 to 20 years, cobalt-chromium (CoCr)-on-CPE showed a high rate of wear-related revision (13 of 101, 12.9%)5. In contrast, the authors of another report noted excellent 15-year survivorship and functional outcome with no wear-related revision in a cohort of 82 patients (89 hips) ≤50 years of age with CoCr-on-HXLPE6. An observational study from the AOANJRR showed that hips in which XLPE was used (199,131 procedures) had a significantly lower revision rate at 16 years following THA for osteoarthritis compared with hips in which CPE was used (41,171 procedures), regardless of the head material7. Ceramic-on-Ceramic (CoC) or Ceramic-on-Polyethylene (CoP) Clicking or squeaking continues to be present in a small percentage of patients who undergo THA with CoC components. In 1 report, audible noise was present in 6.4% of hips (48 of 749) following THA with use of fourth-generation alumina CoC bearings, although no patient underwent revision for clicking or squeaking8. The selection of CoP recently surpassed MoP as the most popular bearing surface used in THA in the U.S.9. Metal-on-Metal (MoM) A study from Korea demonstrated an acceptable rate of aseptic loosening (cup, 10.5%; stem, 6.1%) in a cohort of 114 hips treated with THA using 28-mm MoM components; the average follow-up was 20 years (range, 17 to 23 years)10. Nonetheless, the use of an MoM articulation continues to decline secondary to persistent concerns for metal debris-induced adverse local tissue reactions. Surface Treatment The authors of a prospective multicenter study reported that, at the 5-year follow-up, titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) acetabular shells with a porous titanium coating (PTC) had a higher percentage of gaps/radiolucency compared with plasma-sprayed (PS) acetabular shells from the same manufacturer (23% versus 5%). Patients in the PTC group had more patient-reported pain, although none underwent revision for loosening11. Short Versus Standard Stems In a randomized double-blinded study, persistent mid-thigh pain was much more prevalent among patients with a short Collum Femoris Preserving (CFP) stem (LINK) (19%) compared with a full-profile wedge-tapered Alloclassic Zweymüller stem (Zimmer) (7%) at medium-term follow-up. Both cohorts, however, had a high percentage of varus malalignment (14% and 16%, respectively), and the results may not be generalizable to other cementless designs12. The association between periprosthetic femoral fracture and length/geometry of cementless implants was also studied. In a cohort study of 5,090 consecutive, direct-anterior primary THAs performed at a single institution, the incidence of periprosthetic fracture using femoral components with 4 variations in length and geometry was evaluated13. All stems were of a single-taper wedge design from the same manufacturer, with 1 of 4 configurations: full-length, standard profile; full-length, reduced distal profile; short-length, standard profile; and short-length, reduced distal profile. There was a trend toward a higher risk of periprosthetic fracture in the short-length-with-standard-profile group13. It is unclear whether the same trend would hold using other surgical approaches. Head Size In a study using data from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association database and including 186,231 patients who underwent MoP THA with use of a 28, 32, or 36-mm head, the authors found that the risk of dislocation was reduced with the use of 32 versus 28-mm heads, although the overall revision risk remained similar. Surprisingly, transitioning from 32 to 36-mm heads was associated with a higher risk of revision for all causes, including the risk of dislocation14. It appeared that 32-mm heads would be the optimal choice for MoP THA. Dual-Mobility Constructs Modular dual-mobility constructs employ a CoCr articular surface liner that locks into an outer shell of titanium. A systematic review of mid-term studies of dual-mobility constructs supports their efficacy in reducing the incidence of dislocation after both primary and revision THA15. The wear rate for contemporary dual-mobility constructs using an HXLPE design showed substantially larger magnitudes of initial head penetration and wear than those reported for HXLPE in fixed-bearing couples (twice the rate)16. It approaches a steady state after 2 years, making it comparable with traditional fixed bearings; future studies should address the long-term outcomes16. A propensity score-matched study showed that patients with a dual-mobility construct had a lower risk of revision due to dislocation, although there was no difference in the overall risk of revision between the dual-mobility construct group and the MoP/CoP group. The authors speculated that selection bias may have been present, as the dual-mobility construct group also showed a higher risk of revision due to infection17. Patient Factors in Relation to Outcomes Medical Comorbidities Dialysis dependence was demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for 30-day adverse events, intensive care unit (ICU) care, longer length of stay, and rehabilitation needs in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA)18. Patients with hepatitis C who received interferon or direct antiviral agents prior to THA appeared to have fewer postoperative complications, especially PJI19. Dorr Type In a matched comparative study, a higher incidence of femoral stem-related complications (mainly periprosthetic femoral fractures) was observed when using double-tapered wedge stems in Dorr type-A compared with type-B femora20. A study correlating proximal femoral morphology and leg length after THA showed that patients with a Dorr type-A femur and a high femoral cortical index (FCI, defined as the ratio of cortical width minus endosteal width to the cortical width at a level 100 mm below the tip of the lesser trochanter on an anteroposterior radiograph of the hip) were at increased risk of leg lengthening while patients with a Dorr type-C femur and a low FCI had an increased probability of shortening21. Body Mass Index (BMI) Several studies showed a higher risk of complications (up to 3 times) among THA patients classified as morbidly obese compared with normal controls22-24. In particular, researchers in the U.K. reported on, to our knowledge, the largest longitudinal cohort study to date analyzing the influence of BMI on THA outcomes (>410,000 patients)25. Patients who were morbidly obese (BMI of 40 to 60 kg/m2) had the highest probability of revision at 10 years (twice that of the underweight group), while 90-day mortality was significantly higher for the underweight group compared with those with normal BMI. Milder obesity (BMI of 25 to 40 kg/m2) seemed to have a protective effect against mortality25. In another study, patients classified as super obese (BMI of ≥45 kg/m2) had a greater risk of reoperation and readmission and greater 90-day costs compared with the nonobese cohort, but they had comparable quality-of-life improvements26. Patients classified as morbidly obese who underwent bariatric surgery prior to TJA showed a reduced comorbidity burden at the time of TJA, with reduced post-TJA complications; however, the risk of revision was not reduced27. While obesity seems to be a major negative predictor of adverse outcomes, some argue that THA is still cost-effective for morbidly obese and super obese groups and recommend against a cutoff threshold to avoid unnecessary loss of health-care access28. Preoperative Opioid Use Opioid use within 3 months preceding THA was an independent predictor of early revision, while obesity and anxiety/depression were also shown to predict early failure of treatment29. Significantly higher 30-day readmission and revision rates were observed among THA/TKA (total knee arthroplasty) patients with a history of long-term preoperative opioid use30. In another study, patients who used opioids preoperatively tended to have significantly lower patient-reported outcome scores and longer hospital stays, and were more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation facility31. Tobacco Use In a recent study, smokers had a significantly higher risk of deep infection and reoperation after revision THA compared with nonsmokers, and the risk was higher than for primary THA32. The authors of a systematic review and meta-analysis found that former tobacco users had a significantly lower risk of wound complications and PJI compared with current smokers. Smoking cessation counseling prior to total joint arthroplasty is strongly advocated33. A history of smoking was also recently tied to increased risk of nerve injury in patients undergoing THA34. Surgical Approach The optimal surgical approach in primary THA remains controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies showed less pain and better reported function through 90 days postoperatively for the direct anterior approach compared with the posterior approach35. However, when comparing early revision rates (<5 years from index primary surgery), the direct anterior approach was associated with a significantly higher rate of early revision due to femoral loosening compared with the posterior approach, while the posterior approach demonstrated a higher incidence of early revision due to instability36. A Dutch joint-registry study showed small improvements in the 3-month postoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for the direct anterior and posterolateral approaches compared with the direct lateral and anterolateral approaches37. Regardless of the different approaches, there are minimal differences in gait mechanics at early or late follow-up38. The long-term prognosis of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) neuropathy was also investigated. One study found that approximately 11% of patients had persistent LFCN neuropathic symptoms even at 6 to 8 years after direct anterior THA, and the most common presentation was numbness (37%). This, however, did not affect hip functional scores39. Complications There is substantial variation in reported THA complication rates among national databases and joint registries. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) tends to show the lowest rate of complications40. Medical Complications A study of 10-year Hospital Episode Statistics data from the U.K. including 540,623 THAs showed that postoperative medical complications decreased year-after-year despite a steady rise in the average Charlson Comorbidity Index score. The only 2 exceptions were lower respiratory tract infection and renal failure, which continued to rise41. Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and Anticoagulation A systematic review found that industry-funded studies assessing thromboprophylaxis reported fewer patients with pulmonary embolism (PE), major bleeding, and mortality compared with nonfunded studies42. A cross-sectional study in 5 countries found that the rate of in-hospital VTE after hip arthroplasty was 0.16% in Canada, 1.41% in France, 0.84% in New Zealand, 0.66% in the U.S. (California), and 0.37% in Switzerland, while the benchmark was 0.58%. French data showed a higher rate, potentially because of the systematic use of ultrasound, which could result in the over-detection of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) but not PE43. A retrospective analysis of the NSQIP data set from 2008 to 2016 demonstrated that the risk of DVT was not associated with obesity in patients undergoing THA. The risk of PE, however, was found to be elevated in THA patients whose BMI was ≥35 kg/m2. The authors concluded that, since current pharmacologic anticoagulation regimens can reduce the DVT rate but have not been demonstrated to affect the rate of PE or death, the data do not support increased DVT anticoagulation in THA patients who are obese but without other VTE risk factors44. Dislocation Spinopelvic pathology dominated the literature on THA dislocation, with important research focused on spine-pelvis-hip radiographs in the sagittal plane and the related functional safe zone45-52. It has been proposed that the spinopelvic relationship be categorized according to 4 groups, as assessed at the preoperative evaluation (1A: normal alignment, normal mobility; 1B: normal alignment, stiff spine; 2A: flatback deformity, normal spine; 2B: flatback deformity, stiff spine). Special attention should be paid to the 2B population, for whom surgeons may consider using a dual-mobility construct with targeted 30° of anteversion relative to the functional pelvic plane (based on standing, rather than supine, anteroposterior pelvic radiography)45. A modified classification system was recently proposed on the basis of supine anteroposterior pelvic, standing anteroposterior pelvic, and sitting and standing lateral spinopelvic radiographs46. The classification system adds a hyperlordosis spinal alignment category (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis [PI-LL] mismatch of <–10°) and suggests a new risk assessment tool incorporating sagittal spinal alignment (coded as a number) and spine mobility/stiffness (coded as a letter) to use in revision THA. This new assessment tool was validated in a group of 222 patients who underwent revision hip replacement for recurrent instability. Results for 111 patients who were evaluated using the new spinal function assessment were compared with a matched group of 111 patients who were not evaluated using the system. The dislocation rate was 3% among patients who had the new presurgical assessment compared with 16% for those who did not46. Patients undergoing THA with a history of lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) had a >100% increased risk of dislocation compared with those who had LSF 5 years after THA53. Another study found that fusion to the sacrum as well as multiple levels of lumbar involvement dramatically increased the risk of dislocation in primary THA54. Although there was no increased perioperative spike of dislocation in patients undergoing LSF following an otherwise stable THA, 1 study demonstrated that this population had a sustained elevated risk of dislocation (0.7% per year) compared with those without LSF (0.4% risk per year)55. PJI The past decade saw tremendous effort and focus on preventing PJI in patients undergoing TJA. Current unadjusted 1-year and 5-year risks of PJI following THA were found to be 0.69% and 1.09%, respectively. After adjustment, however, there was no detectable decline in the risk of PJI over time56. Once PJI is confirmed, the 1-year weighted mortality rate was noted to be 4.22%, and 5-year mortality, 21.12%, highlighting the devastating consequence of PJI57. A PJI consortium (International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections) recently published a guideline for comprehensive hip and knee PJI diagnosis, prevention, and treatment58-65. With the new evidence-based and validated PJI criteria in 2018, PJI diagnosis now consists of a scoring system for minor criteria in both preoperative and intraoperative diagnosis66. One recent study found that there is no difference in treatment success as defined by the Delphi criteria between patients meeting minor-only criteria and those meeting a major criterion of PJI diagnosis67. Another PJI scoring model assigns relative weights to the various risk factors for PJI following TJA. A previous open surgical procedure, drug abuse, a revision procedure, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) were deemed the most influential factors68. A positive association between postoperative urinary tract infection and PJI after THA or TKA was established in a population-based, retrospective cohort study of 113,061 patients (≥66 years old). No association was found between acute postoperative urinary retention and PJI69. Debate continues regarding the merits of 1-stage versus 2-stage revision for PJI. In a recent Danish study, the authors reported an encouraging 91% infection-free survival rate at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up when using 1-stage cementless revision in the treatment of patients with chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection70. In another study, about 30% of revisions had an increase in the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) between 2 stages, raising concerns about the potential for the emergence of resistant organisms between the stages of a 2-stage revision71. Postoperative Urinary Retention Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention have been defined, including an age of >60 years, intraoperative fluid administration of >1,350 mL, and intraoperative of an of risk factors related to postoperative urinary retention are and should be Although the percentage probability of periprosthetic femoral fracture using cementless stems was demonstrated to be only at 10 years, this dramatically increased to at years after primary another study the incidence of periprosthetic femoral fracture in stems found that the incidence of periprosthetic femoral fracture continued to increase after the decade and the incidence of aseptic loosening in the decade A study using data from the national found that the annual incidence of periprosthetic femoral fracture in primary THAs increased from of to of the of to In the report, type-C 4 more than and they were more commonly in cemented The incidence of with MoP is and an average of 5 years to metal the ratio have been shown to be higher in MoP (range, or compared with MoM (range, to Another study a level of and a ratio of to be a cutoff threshold for important MoP The levels of and to decline by and 3 months after potential in the femoral nerve was observed in 17 of patients who underwent the direct anterior approach in THA when were against the anterior of the although this was The authors of another recent study of the anterior in a relative safe to the to avoid In a recent retrospective cohort study using the A data was found to be associated with significantly lower rates of dislocation and aseptic revision of the acetabular following primary The authors when their results because of potential by In a double-blinded study in the U.K. that patients undergoing THA or the use of with an and to show a in the rate of surgical infection Current and The past decade has a rise in the incidence of both outpatient and THA, according to a recent comparative and have been for or to be while also patient supports a trend toward better postoperative outcomes when hip replacement is performed by While the majority of primary THAs are performed at surgeons are the majority of these A more relationship was by a New data set of of the was associated with a 2 to increase in the risk of complications, mortality, and revision relative to while hospital was associated with a increase in complications and a 4 to increase in The opioid has has more attention in recent years. regarding opioid after joint replacement surgery show that to of patients continue opioid use even at 1 year have been to reduce opioid without of A study indicated that fewer compared with 90 was associated with a in opioid and decreased opioid without pain scores and patient-reported In a retrospective review of patients who underwent THA and TKA reported a history of those reported and including respiratory and In this study, no patient with a who was an adverse It was also found that, for the patients with a who were or no differences could be found in the rate of Use is now an of the THA to reduce loss and the risk of by including the American Association of and Surgeons and the American of Orthopaedic Surgeons state that no of or time of administration have been shown to A recent randomized study did that multiple postoperative of reduced loss compared with a single preoperative The of 1 preoperative of 2 by 3 postoperative of of loss in Smoking A study from the demonstrated that level of 8 within 1 of TJA could significantly rates of smokers It also to of patients who reported as continued smoking and as more than after surgery among those who and A from demonstrated that the administration of could to for among patients undergoing THA, by a in postoperative pain scores of was also in reducing opioid and The of use in patients with undergoing THA or TKA was recently in a retrospective study of 2 of patients in the group and in the patients who received were not found to have a significantly higher infection rate than to the that PJI is an this study have been with the of with a a mainly a spinal using significantly the length of of patients undergoing THA by 1 Postoperative Current evidence that the postoperative of and levels following THA in patients with a normal preoperative level is the should be by risk factors and Preoperative and levels of and 4 have been as below which should consider postoperative and It has been that consider the use of the in for THA including of patients with THA with a had significantly higher than those without a and among the THA with a was greater for those The of The a of recently published studies related to the system that received a higher of In to in this 4 other with a higher of to hip replacement are to this review after the standard with a about to in an evidence-based in this treatment and risk of or after total hip a cohort study from national Danish Joint This to the knowledge, the largest study using the Danish databases to address the association between perioperative treatment and postoperative 30-day PE, and from all among patients who underwent THA. A total of patients were the study from to among received perioperative and did After use was not found to significantly increase the risk of PE, or The authors were to the of using on patients with previous and other in this of on outcomes after primary and revision total hip at the a cohort study patients who underwent primary or revision THA from through A using 32 factors found in the medical including 17 and of was used to the study population as index of of to and of With to in-hospital complications, differences were found only for wound complications and the and with patients had a significantly higher risk of mortality ratio of dislocation, wound and reoperation within 90 days and 1 year after primary THA. The authors did not a association of with aseptic periprosthetic or prior bariatric surgery outcomes following total joint arthroplasty in the morbidly A This meta-analysis studies from to 2018, with a total of patients who underwent THA or underwent bariatric surgery prior to TJA and the patients with obesity as the group. The study found that bariatric surgery prior to TJA was associated with reduced risks of medical complications, length of stay, and The risks of wound infection or and the long-term risks of dislocation, periprosthetic and revision were not the THA and TKA bariatric surgery was associated with a in the risk of PJI after but not after THA. of of and on in the after total hip the randomized The and in is a Danish study the and of 4 regimens or after THA. The was 1 surgery and 6 for for a total of 4 of the on the postoperative and patients were in the The authors found that significantly reduced compared with in the after The surgical approach versus for the study cohort was not which have the postoperative for

Objective To investigate the early clinical effect of lateral decubitus position direct anterior approach(DAA) for primary total hip arthroplasty(THA) in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of hip(DDH). Methods A retrospective study was performed on 56 cases of DDH patients who were admitted from September 2015 to September 2016.According to different approaches, patients were divided into the DAA group(n=28) and the posterolateral approach(PLA) group(n=28). The follow-up time ranged from 7 to 15 months(average 9.2 months). Statistics of the two groups with incision length, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, total blood loss, ambulation time and hospitalization days, VAS pain score of 1, 3, 5, 7 days after operation, Harris hip score of 3, 7 days, 1, 3, 6 months after surgery, the incidence of postoperative complications were analyzed. Results There was no significant difference in operative incision length and operation time between the DAA group and the PLA group(P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, total blood loss, the activity time and the average hospital stay of DAA group were less than those of PLA group(P 0.05); the VAS scores of 1, 3, 5 and 7 days in the DAA group were smaller than those in the PLA group(P<0.05). Two patients had posterior dislocation of the PLA group. Conclusion The DAA of THA has the advantages of less pain, less bleeding, strong anti dislocation ability, rapid recovery; at the same time, the DAA of THA doesn′t need special operation bed, simple disinfection, it has the same position with PLA, which will not increase the difficulty of surgery because of changes in position, shorten the learning curve. Key words: Hip arthroplasty; Lateral decubitus position; Direct anterior approach; Posterolateral approach; Developmental dysplasia of hip

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine if it was feasible and safe to perform total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the direct anterior approach (DAA) when compared with the conventional posterolateral approach (PA) in patients with femoral neck fractures. The time required to start walking was investigated to identify advantages of the muscle-sparing approach. Safety of the approach was judged based on the incidence and nature of all complications.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 67 THA cases due to femoral neck fractures from October 2015 to January 2019. The PA was used in 31 cases, and the DAA was used in 36 cases. The average operative time and amount of bleeding were evaluated. Cup inclination, anteversion, and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were also measured on radiographs. The time to start walking and complications (e.g., intraoperative fracture, infection, and dislocation) were recorded.ResultsThe mean operative time was 84.35 ± 13.95 minutes in PA group and 99.22 ± 20.33 minutes in DAA group (p = 0.010). But after experiencing 20 cases using the DAA, there was no statistically significant difference in the operative time between the groups. The mean volume of bleeding was 428.73 ± 207.26 mL in the PA group and 482.47 ± 150.14 mL in the DAA group. There was no difference in the acetabular cup position between two groups. Ambulation was started at 3.94 days after surgery on average in the PA group and 3.14 days in the DAA group, showing a statistically significant difference. Intraoperative fracture and infection were not observed in either group. The incidence of LLD was 1 in each group. The dislocation rate was 3.2% (1 case) in the PA group and 5.5% (2 cases) in the DAA group.ConclusionsAlthough the DAA for THA was similar to the PA in terms of operative time, volume of bleeding, and complications, the DAA showed a great advantage in early rehabilitation as a muscle-sparing procedure in the elderly with femoral neck fractures.

Early Practice All-Cause Complications for Fellowship-Trained Anterior Hip Surgeons Are Not Increased When Compared to “Gold Standard” Experienced Posterior Approach Surgeons

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of 2 approaches to total hip arthroplasty—the direct anterior approach and the posterolateral approach—in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. A total of 201 patients who were hospitalized between 2018 and 2023 for this condition were included in the study. Of the total number of patients, 100 underwent the procedure via the direct anterior approach (study group), whereas 101 underwent total hip arthroplasty via the posterolateral approach (control group). A range of clinical and patient data was gathered, including the following: age, gender, body mass index, disease classification, symptom history, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion volume, incision length, operation time, hospital stay, visual analog scale score, Harris score, Barthel index, postoperative complications, follow-up time, leg length discrepancy, and femur offset difference. The lack of statistically significant variations in age, gender, body mass index, and symptom history among the 2 patient groups suggests that they were comparable. Nevertheless, notable disparities were observed between the groups with regard to the length of the surgical incision (P < .001) and intraoperative blood loss (P < .001). Significant differences (P < .001) were observed in the visual analog scale scores of the patients in the study group at 1 day (6.71 ± 0.46), 3 days (5.71 ± 0.46), and 1 week (0.96 ± 0.20) after surgery, in comparison with the control group (7.46 ± 0.51, 6.35 ± 0.49, 1.73 ± 0.67). In addition, notable distinctions were detected in the Harris score between the groups at the Harris score 3 months postsurgery (P < .001) and at the last follow-up (P = .012). Furthermore, noteworthy distinctions were observed in the study group regarding both preoperative and postoperative leg length discrepancy (P < .001), in addition to preoperative offset and postoperative offset (P < .001). The utilization of the direct anterior approach in total hip replacement presents several advantages, including reduced tissue damage, decreased pain, quicker postoperative functional recovery, reduced dislocation risk, and enhanced hip joint functionality. This approach is in accordance with the tenets of minimally invasive surgery and improved recovery protocols, rendering it a feasible option for the management of developmental dysplasia of the hip among individuals.

Comparing Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterolateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty on Physical Function Recovery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical results of the direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterolateral approach (PLA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients.MethodsFrom January 2017 to September 2019, 80 patients who received primary THA in our hospital were retrospectively selected based on the propensity score matching (PSM) method. Baseline characteristics of patients who underwent the DAA and PLA were collected. Moreover, the incision length, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, length of stay, and Harris hip score were compared between patients in the two groups. The CK level was used to assess muscle damage between patients in the DAA and PLA groups. The complications of these two approaches were also evaluated at patients' 12‐month follow‐up evaluation.ResultsThere was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between patients in the two groups (p > 0.05). The patients in the DAA group had a shorter incision length (9.2 ± 0.2 vs 14.7 ± 0.5, respectively; p < 0.05) and shorter length of hospital stay (9.5 ± 0.7 vs 12.9 ± 0.8, respectively, p < 0.05) than patients in the PLA group. Moreover, the DAA was associated with a decrease in intraoperative blood loss compared with the PLA (109.1 ± 12.6 vs 305.1 ± 14.1 ml, respectively, p < 0.05). However, the operation time was longer in patients in the DAA group (130.7 ± 1.7) than in patients in the PLA group (112.6 ± 1.3 min, p < 0.05). The CK level of patients in the DAA group was lower than that of patients in the PLA group (p < 0.05). The CK level at 48 h post‐surgery was negatively correlated with the Harris hip scores at 6 months after THA (r = −0.538, p = 0.000). Compared with patients in the PLA group, the muscle strength of patients in the DAA group was significantly higher than that of patients in the DAA group at 4 days (p < 0.05) and 7 days (p < 0.05) after THA. The Harris hip scores of patients in the DAA group and PLA group were 81.0 ± 0.8 vs 70.8 ± 0.7 at 6 weeks, 93.4 ± 0.9 vs 86.4 ± 0.6 at 3 months, and 96.8 ± 1.1 vs 93.4 ± 0.8 at 6 months, respectively, both p < 0.05. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between patients in the DAA and PLA groups (p > 0.05).ConclusionDAA was superior to the PLA in improving hip function after THA. Compared with the PLA, the DAA could reduce muscle damage, which is negatively correlated with hip function. Further multi‐institution studies are required with longer follow‐up durations, and larger patient populations are needed to provide more definitive conclusions.

Does Approach Matter in Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Comparison of Early Reoperations Between Direct Anterior and Postero-Lateral Approach

The most effective surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. The direct anterior approach may be associated with a reduced risk of dislocation, faster recovery, reduced pain and fewer surgical complications. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current evidence for the use of this approach in THA. Following the Cochrane collaboration, an extensive literature search of PubMed, Medline, Embase and OvidSP was conducted. Randomised controlled trials, comparative studies, and cohort studies were included. Outcomes included the length of the incision, blood loss, operating time, length of stay, complications, and gait analysis. A total of 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were of medium to low quality. There was no difference between the direct anterior, anterolateral or posterior approaches with regards to length of stay and gait analysis. Papers comparing the length of the incision found similar lengths compared with the lateral approach, and conflicting results when comparing the direct anterior and posterior approaches. Most studies found the mean operating time to be significantly longer when the direct anterior approach was used, with a steep learning curve reported by many. Many authors used validated scores including the Harris hip score, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index. These mean scores were better following the use of the direct anterior approach for the first six weeks post-operatively. Subsequently there was no difference between these scores and those for the posterior approach. There is little evidence for improved kinematics or better long-term outcomes following the use of the direct anterior approach for THA. There is a steep learning curve with similar rates of complications, length of stay and outcomes. Well-designed, multi-centre, prospective randomised controlled trials are required to provide evidence as to whether the direct anterior approach is better than the lateral or posterior approaches when undertaking THA. Cite this article: Bone JointJ 2017;99-B:732-40.

To compare the accuracy of implant positioning and early functional recovery between direct anterior approach (DAA) and posterolateral approach (PLA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) guided by an artificial intelligence preoperative planning system (AIHIP). The study population consisted of 206 patients who underwent DAA surgery and 81 patients who underwent PLA surgery, all of whom were designed preoperatively using AI-HIP, and postoperatively using artefact-reduced CT reconstruction for prosthesis mounting angle measurements and follow-up such as postoperative outcomes. The main assessments included prosthesis positioning accuracy (compared to the preoperative plan): acetabular anterior inclination (AA), femur anterior inclination (FNA), combined anterior inclination (CA), alignment of femoral stem prosthesis and femur; clinical outcomes: operative time, hospital stay, and time to grounding; functional scores: Harris Hip Score, WOMAC, and VAS Pain Score; and biomarkers: haemoglobin, CRP, and IL-6, among others. All 287 patients completed ≥6-month follow-up. While preoperative femoral/acetabular anteversion showed no intergroup differences (p > 0.05), the direct anterior approach (DAA) demonstrated superior postoperative acetabular anteversion control (20.93 ± 7.54° vs. 24.34 ± 7.93°, p < 0.001) despite comparable femoral anteversion (12.97 ± 6.93° vs. 14.56 ± 7.21°, p = 0.009). AI-assisted predictions exhibited smaller deviations in DAA for both parameters (FNA: 3.12 ± 5.88° vs. 5.59 ± 8.21°, p = 0.005; AA: 0.93 ± 7.54° vs. -4.34 ± 7.93°, p < 0.001). No significant differences emerged in combined anteversion, acetabular abduction, or femoral stem alignment parameters (all p > 0.05). DAA achieved shorter incisions (10.64 ± 0.94 vs. 15.21 ± 1.33cm, p < 0.001) and hospital stays (7.59 ± 4.18 vs. 9.09 ± 3.65 days, p < 0.001) despite longer operative times (118.67 ± 26.95 vs. 53.27 ± 58.71min, p < 0.001). Functional recovery favored DAA, with better VAS/Harris scores at 3 months and WOMAC scores at 1 month (all p < 0.05). No intergroup differences were observed in postoperative CK, CRP, Hb, or IL-6 levels (p > 0.05). Both DAA and PLA approaches resulted in satisfactory postoperative outcomes; however, the DAA approach demonstrated enhanced early postoperative efficacy indicators, as well as improved femoral neck and acetabular anteversion compared to the PLA approach. This study advocates for the preferential adoption of the DAA technique for THA, while also emphasizing the importance of considering individual patient factors, as well as the surgeon's preferences and expertise.