Abstract

To compare the quality of ambulatory diabetes care provided by physicians in an endocrinology clinic with that in a primary-care clinic. We conducted a retrospective study of the medical records of patients with diabetes treated for 2 to 4 years in an endocrinology clinic and a primary-care clinic at an academic medical center. Adherence to American Diabetes Association (ADA) clinical practice recommendations and hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels were assessed in randomly chosen patients-a total of 68 patients from the primary-care clinic and 105 patients from the endocrinology clinic, with total patient-years of follow-up of 241 and 370, respectively. In six of seven areas assessed, the endocrinology clinic was significantly more compliant with ADA recommendations than was the primary-care clinic: queries about hypoglycemia (88% versus 20%); frequency of glycated hemoglobin determinations (3.3 versus 2.1 per patient/yr); yearly lipid panel (44% versus 25%); and yearly ophthalmologic (90% versus 50%), neurologic (56% versus 37%), and foot (88% versus 59%) examinations (all P<0.001). The rate of yearly proteinuria evaluations was similar in the two clinics (66% versus 65%). On assessment of all patients, the mean HbA(1c) level was significantly lower in the endocrinology clinic (8.29%) than in the primary-care clinic (8.73%) (P = 0.01). Adherence to ADA clinical practice recommendations was significantly better in the endocrinology clinic than in the primary-care clinic. This finding and the significantly lower levels of HbA(1c) in patients in the endocrinology clinic setting would be expected to translate into improved long-term patient outcome.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.