Abstract
An analysis of the efficacy of two techniques of posterior spinal instrumentation in patients with idiopathic scoliosis was performed. Thirty-two consecutive patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation and no external bracing were compared with 30 consecutive patients treated with Harrington rod instrumentation supplemented by Bobechko hooks, sublaminar wires, and postoperative bracing. The groups were similar in age, curve magnitude, and type. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation demonstrated significantly improved immediate frontal plane correction. It was also more effective in improving thoracic kyphosis, particularly in patients with preoperative hypokyphosis. Both procedures were performed with similar operative time, blood loss, and minimal complication rates.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
