Comparison of Clinical Outcomes by Different Renal Replacement Therapy in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease Secondary to Lupus Nephritis

This retrospective study was designed to compare the cause of hospitalization and influencing factors between patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Baseline data and laboratory parameters of 192 dialysis patients (92 HD patients and 100 PD patients) were compared. Quantitative parameters with normal distribution were assessed using independent t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA). Quantitative parameters with non-normal distribution were assessed by non-parametric test. Qualitative data were statistically compared using χ2 test. The number of patients with urban employee medical insurance (88 HD patients and 60 PD patients) and rural cooperative medical care (12 HD patients and 40 PD patients) significantly differed (P < .01). The hospitalization rate of PD patients was significantly higher than that of HD counterparts. The average length of hospital stay of PD patients was 10 days, remarkably longer than 8 days of HD patients (P < .01). The primary cause of hospitalization for HD patients was infection-related complications, followed by cardiovascular, cerebrovascular complications and dialysis access disorders. The primary cause of hospitalization for PD patients was infection-related complications, followed by dialysis access disorders, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal complications. Compared with the HD group, the levels of hemoglobin, serum albumin, alkaline phosphatase, intact parathyroid hormone were significantly decreased, whereas serum urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, phosphorus levels and cardiothoracic ratio were remarkably increased in the PD group (all P < .01). The hospitalization rate of PD patients is relatively higher, and the length of hospital stay is longer. Extensive attention and efforts should be delivered to enhance the understanding of disease and lower the risk of complications for patients.

Long-term outcomes in lupus patients receiving different renal replacement therapy.

Background and Aims Among peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD) while waiting for a kidney transplant (KT), which is better in terms of KT outcomes has long been of interest. Nowadays it is difficult to agree on which modality is better. The primary objective of this study was to compare the incidence of composite outcomes (delayed graft function, primary non-function, biopsy-proven acute rejection) within 1 year after primary adult KT between recipients taken PD and HD before KT (PD group vs. HD group, respectively). Method This study was a prospective, multi-sites cohort study. We used a propensity score matching to control for patients characteristics. Results Total 1040 patients were enrolled consecutively. Among them, 1030 patients (248, PD group; 782, HD group) were included in the final analysis. The HD group was older and had higher prevalence of diabetes, higher Charlson comorbidity index score, higher prevalence of positive PRA and more prescription of rituximab than the PD group significantly. After propensity score matching (246, PD group; 476, HD group), there were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. In the whole population, there was no difference in the risk of the composite outcomes between the PD and HD groups (19% vs. 17%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88 ∼ 1.77, p = 0.21). There were also no differences in the risk of each component in the composite outcomes between the two groups. Primary non-function, a component of the composite outcomes did not occur in the both groups. There were no differences in the risks of death, frequency and total duration of re-hospitalization after KT for 1 year, and the changes of eGFR for 1 year between the two groups. The results from the propensity score matched population were consistent with those from the whole population. There was no difference in the risk of the composite outcomes between the PD and HD groups (19% vs. 17%, HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.80 ∼ 1.74, p = 0.43). Conclusion The pre-transplant dialysis modality does not affect the incidences of delayed graft function and acute rejection in early period of KT. (NCT01513707) This study was supported by Baxter Incorporated.

Background Hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are effective ways to treat end-stage renal disease (ERSD). This study aimed to investigate the differences in survival and the factors that influence it in patients with end-stage renal disease treated with HD or PD. Methods We retrospectively analyzed factors related to all-cause death with renal replacement therapy and compared the long-term mortality between HD and PD strategies in patients with ESRD who started HD or PD treatment in our renal HD center between January 1, 2008, and December 1, 2021. Results Overall, 1,319 patients were included, comprising 690 and 629 patients in the HD and PD groups, respectively, according to the inclusion criteria. After propensity matching, 922 patients remained, with 461 (50%) patients each in the two groups. There were no significant differences in the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year mortality rates between the HD and PD groups (all p > .05). However, the 5- and 10-year mortality rates of the matched patients were 15.8%. 17.6% in the HD group and 21.0%. 27.3% in the PD group, respectively. The 5- and 10-year mortality rates were significantly lower in the HD group (all p < .05) as compared to the PD group. After matching, Kaplan–Meier curve analysis with log-rank test was performed, which showed a significant difference in the survival rates between the two groups (p = .001). Logistic multifactor regression analysis revealed that age, weight, hypertension, serum creatinine, and combined neoplasms influenced the survival rate of patients with ESRD (p < .05). In contrast, age, hypertension, parathyroid hormone (PTH), serum creatinine, and peripheral vascular diseases (PVD) influenced the survival rate of patients in the HD group (p < .05), and age and weight influenced the survival rate of patients in the PD group (p < .05). Conclusions This study found that long-term mortality rates were higher in the PD group than that in the HD group, indicating that HD may be superior to PD.

Background/Aims: To examine the relationship of extracellular fluid (ECF) volume and osmotic excess with treatment modality, we retrospectively analyzed spontaneous body weight loss and osmotic excretion versus true body weight after kidney transplantation in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and preemptive transplant recipients compared with hemodialysis (HD) patients. We also examined maximum bladder volume in other transplant recipients on PD. Methods: From 2005 to 2011, 42 PD patients underwent kidney transplantation at our institution. Patients aged <12 years and cadaveric transplantations were excluded; we enrolled 27 PD patients (PD group; age 35.7 ± 14.4 years at transplantation; dialysis duration 36.5 ± 31.2 months) and 14 adult preemptive kidney transplant patients (preemptive group; age 31.7 ± 15.7 years; estimated glomerular filtration rate 8.26 ± 1.8 mL/min/1.73 m² at transplantation). From 2005 to 2006, 29 adult living-related donor kidney transplant recipients on HD support (HD group) were enrolled as controls (age 36.4 ± 11.3 years; dialysis duration 37.5 ± 55.2 months). Results: Percentage body weight loss at 1 month after transplantation was 5% from ideal body weight for the PD group (51.2 ± 14.3 to 48.6 ± 13.0 kg, p = 0.002), 5.1% for the preemptive group (56.7 ± 17.4 to 53.8 ± 16.5 kg, p = 0.0005), and 1% for the HD group (52.9 ± 12.4 to 52.1 ± 12.5 kg, p = 0.079); post-transplantation 24-h osmotic excretion was greater in the PD and preemptive groups (387.3 ± 175.7 mOsm) groups than in HD (250 ± 124 mOsm; p = 0.006. Another 69 adult living-related donor kidney transplant recipients (PD and HD support) with dialysis duration ≤5 years were examined. Mean dialysis duration differed in the HD (17.5 ± 13.1 months) and PD (29.6 ± 20.4 months, p = 0.015) groups; mean urine volume and maximum desire to void (MDV) were similar. Conclusion: ECF volume and osmotic excess occurred in the PD and preemptive groups compared with the HD group pre-transplantation. Although PD maintains MDV and residual and total urine volume, ECF volume and osmotic excess should be monitored before transplant; pre-transplant HD support should always be considered in PD and preemptive transplant patients.

SUN-221 RATES OF HOSPITALISATION IN THE FIRST YEAR AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY- SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE

Objective To compare the influence of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) on early outcome of patients underwent kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death (DCD). Methods Patients admitted in the First People's Hospital of Foshan with DCD kidney transplant from January 1st, 2011 to June 30th, 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Recipients were grouped into HD group (n=61) and PD group (n=28) according to their pre-transplant dialysis modality. Their short-term outcomes after DCD kidney transplant were compared, including recovery of renal function, short-term complications and laboratory data. Results Patients had longer dialysis duration and lower hemoglobin, serum albumin and phosphorus in PD group than those in HD group (all P 0.05). HD patients with 6.00(4.00, 11.00) d recovery time of renal function, 18.00(17.00, 21.50) d hospital time, had 24.59% the delayed graft function (DGF), 3.28% acute rejection and 16.39% infection during hospitalization. While for PD patients the recovery time of renal function was 4.00(3.75, 7.00) d; hospital time was 19.00(15.00, 21.75) d; the incidence rate of DGF was 14.29%; acute rejection was 3.57%; and infection during hospitalization reached 17.86%. Above indexes were not significantly different between HD and PD groups (all P>0.05). Repeated measure ments showed that, compared with those before transplant surgery, after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months HD and PD groups had decreased creatinine and phosphorus, and increased hemoglobinserum albumin and calcium; Serum albumin and calcium were different between the two groups (P<0.001, P=0.040), whereas creatinine, hemoglobin and phosphorus did not show difference (all P<0.05). After transplantation the trends of creatinine, hemoglobin, calcium and phosphorus were not different between the two groups (P values were 0.295, 0.310, 0.501 and 0.063, respectively). Conclusions No significant difference of the recovery regarding renal function, anemia, nutrition status and mineral metabolites was found between pre-transplant HD and PD modality in patients who underwent DCD kidney transplantations. Key words: Renal dialysis; Peritoneal dialysis; Tissue and organ procurement; Kidney transplantation

Objectives: The aortic stiffness index beta (ASI-β), calculated noninvasively with the pressure change caused by arterial strain and volume changes on echocardiography, shows a strong correlation with invasive measurements of arterial stiffness. This study aimed to compare arterial stiffness and distensibility between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) and patients in renal replacement therapy. Methods: This cross-sectional and observational study analyzed 108 patients under renal replacement therapy (PD and HD). The aortic stiffness index beta (ASI-β) was calculated for each group. Results: The mean age of the patients in the study was 58.2±11.1 years, and 49 (45.4%) of the patients were female and 59 (54.6%) were male. Age, gender, comorbid rates, and levels of blood pressure and heart rate did not differ between the PD and HD groups. Blood pressure levels and heart rate. Mean aortic strain (5.6±1.9 vs. 9.4±2.8, p &amp;lt; 0.001) and median distensibility (1.5 vs. 2.9 cm, p &amp;lt; 0.001) were lower in the PD group than the HD group, while median ASI-β (11.6 vs. 6.2, p &amp;lt; 0.001) and mean E/e’ (10.6±2.9 vs. 9.2±2.3, p = 0.006) were higher in the PD group. The rate of concentric hypertrophy was higher in the PD group (47.5% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.005). Conclusion: PD patients have higher arterial stiffness and lower distensibility levels compared to HD patients. Therefore, patients with PD may be more prone to diastolic dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, and events.

Influence of Dialysis Modality on Complications and Patient and Graft Survival After Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), off ering superior survival and quality of life compared with dialysis. Several observational studies have investigated the infl uence of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) on post-transplant outcomes. Objective: to assess the effect of dialysis modality prior to KT on outcomes during the fi rst two years after transplantation. Materials and methods . The study included 95 KT recipients, divided into two groups: (1) patients previously treated with PD (n = 45) and (2) patients previously treated with HD (n = 50). The groups were comparable in age, dialysis duration, and immunosuppressive therapy regimens. The mean follow-up period was 19.4 ± 6.4 months. Results . Delayed graft function (DGF) occurred less frequently in the PD group (17.8%) compared with the HD group (34%), although the diff erence did not reach statistical signifi cance (p = 0.08). Patients in the HD group required signifi cantly more rehospitalizations, with a median of 2.24 [1–3] compared to 1.9 [0–2.5] in the PD group (p = 0.01). Infectious complications were also more common among HD patients (62% vs 42%, p = 0.005). In particular, bacterial infections occurred signifi cantly more often in the HD group (63% vs 43%, p = 0.0001), whereas viral and fungal infections were detected at similar frequencies in both groups (p &gt; 0.2). The incidence of graft rejection was comparable between groups. Two-year graft survival (91% in PD vs 94% in HD, p = 0.8) and patient survival (94% in PD vs 96% in HD, p = 0.9) did not diff er signifi cantly. Likewise, serum creatinine and daily proteinuria at the end of follow-up showed no statistically signifi cant diff erences (p = 0.7 and p = 0.3, respectively). Conclusion . In this study, patients who received PD prior to transplantation showed more favorable post-transplant outcomes, including a signifi cantly lower frequency of rehospitalizations and infectious complications, as well as a trend toward reduced DGF. However, two-year graft and patient survival were similar between the PD and HD groups.

Transitions in an integrated model of renal replacement therapy in a regional health system

The prevalence rates of hepatosteatosis and gallstones are increasing owing to the multifactorial causes of chronic kidney disease, and the prevalence may change with the availability of different forms of renal replacement therapy. We aimed to determine the incidence or prevalence rates of hepatosteatosis, cholelithiasis, and acute cholecystitis in patients with chronic kidney disease and compare them between renal replacement therapy modalities. A total of 270 patients (90 with chronic kidney disease stages III-V, 90 undergoing peritoneal dialysis, and 90 undergoing hemodialysis) were included and categorized into the pre-dialysis, hemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis groups. The patients were questioned about previous gallbladder surgeries and chronic diseases. The results of abdominal ultrasonography, tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging were retrospectively evaluated with respect to the findings on the hepatobiliary system. Hepatosteatosis and cholelithiasis were diagnosed by expert radiologists on the basis of abdominal ultrasonography, tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings. The prevalence rates of hepatosteatosis, cholelithiasis, and other liver findings were compared between the groups. Hepatosteatosis and cholelithiasis were detected in 16.7% and 21.5% of the 270 cases, respectively. Hepatosteatosis was present in 17.8%, 25.6%, and 6.7% of patients in the pre-dialysis, hemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis groups, respectively. The prevalence of hepatosteatosis was significantly higher in patients undergoing hemodialysis than in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (p = 0.002). However, no statistically significant difference was found between the peritoneal dialysis and pre-dialysis groups or between the hemodialysis and pre-dialysis groups (p >0.05). The prevalence rates of cholelithiasis were 15.6%, 28.9%, and 20.0%, in the pre-dialysis, hemodialysis, and peritoneal dialysis groups, respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences among the groups. The incidence of acute cholecystitis was significantly higher in the hemodialysis group than in the pre-dialysis group (p = 0.006). Our study showed that the hepatobiliary system is frequently affected in chronic kidney disease and that the findings may differ depending on the renal replacement therapy modality.

To compare the economic burden and cost-utility analysis of the renal replacement therapies, including hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and allograft kidney transplantation (KT) among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients from Yunnan Province, China. Multistage stratified random sampling method was used to select presentative sample of 298 patients from four hospitals in Yunnan Province. The two-step model was applied to calculate a direct economic burden; the human capital approach was used to analyze the indirect economic burden. SF-36 scale was applied to assess the quality of life, while the improving score of quality of life was used to evaluate the cost-utility score. A total of 298 patients were analyzed, including 108 HD patients, 91 PD patients and 99 KT patients. The mean unit economic expenses of HD, PD, and KT were $11,783.6 ± 402.63, $11,059.8 ± 709.51, and $21,151.1 ± 11,419.57, respectively. Based on the cost-utility analysis, the cost of improving one unit of quality of life in KT, PD, and HD was $599.86, $1373.89 and $2021.20, respectively; a significant difference was observed between the KT group and the HD or PD group (P < 0.05). The economic burden of ESRD in Yunnan was substantial. The cost-utility was the best in the renal transplantation group. Kidney transplantation is still recommended as the first approach for patients with ESRD, followed by PD.

AimSkin test anergy is common in patients with uremia and during maintenance hemodialysis treatment. However, up to date only one study concerning skin test in peritoneal dialysis patients has focused on the issue. Our cross-sectional controlled study was conducted to analyze the correlation of purified protein derivative (PPD) test response with demographical features, nutritional parameters and the distribution of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patientsPatients and methodsStable 30 hemodialysis (HD) patients (16 men, 14 women) and 30 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients (17 men, 13 women) were included. Thirty healthy cases (15 men, 15 women) with a mean age of 32.4 ± 9.4 constituted the control group.ResultsIn the HD group, 14 patients (46.6%) were PPD positive, and ın the PD group 16 patients (53.3%) were PPD positive. In the PPD-positive HD patients 64.2% (9/14), and in the PPD-positive PD patients 62.4% (10/16) had an induration of 10 mm or greater. In the control group, 21 of 30 patients (70%) were PPD positive. Comparison of both HD and PD groups with the control group showed significant differences in PPD reactivity (p < 0.01). Albumin levels were significantly high in the control groups (p < 0.01), and cholesterol levels were significantly high in the PD and the control groups (p < 0.05). Transferrin levels were significantly high in the PD (p < 0.01). The lymphocyte counts were significantly high in the control group compared to the HD patients (p < 0.05). The lymphocyte subset percentages CD19 were high in the control groups (p < 0.05), and CD16/56 was significantly high in the PD groups (p < 0.05). All the parameters were also similar between PPD-positive and -negative same groups.ConclusionThe prevalence of PPD positivity was lower in the PD and HD groups. The PPD test responses were not related to the peripheral lymphocyte counts, subsets and malnutrition parameters.

Kidney Transplantation Is Superior to Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis in Terms of Cognitive Function, Anxiety, and Depression Symptoms in Chronic Kidney Disease