Comparison of cleavage site specificity of gelatinases A and B using collagenous peptides

Abstract

The gelatinases (type IV collagenases) are members of the matrix metalloproteinase family that not only have a high degree of structural homology but are known to be nearly identical in their digestion profile against macromolecular substrates. We have shown previously that the preferred cleavage sites in the hydrolysis of type I gelatine, catalyzed by gelatinase A (72 kDa type IV collagenase), are bracketed by hydroxyproline in the P5 and P5′ positions. In this report, a kinetic investigation using a series of collagenous dodecylpeptides in which the P5 and P5′ hydroxyprolines were systematically varied and used as substrates for recombinant human gelatinase A, we show that replacement with either proline or alanine always resulted in increased K m. In contrast, substitution of the hydroxylated amino acids tyrosine and serine at P5 and P5′ reduced the K m significantly, indicating that the hydroxyl moiety of the hydroxyproline is the functional group responsible for favorable enzyme-substrate affinity. This was shown by the K cat/ K m ratio, which was doubled by the substitution of serine in that site. Cleavage of the same series of dodecylpeptides by recombinant human gelatinase B (92 kDa type IV collagenase) showed a very different kinetic profile for which no patterns were discernible. In subsequent comparisons of the two enzymes, it was found that gelatinase B cleaved the thiopeptolide substrate AcProLeuGly-S-LeuGly-OC 2H 5 at double the velocity of gelatinase A. In contrast, gelatinase A digested type I gelatin about 2.5-times faster than gelatinase B. SDS-PAGE analysis of gelatin cleavage products showed different patterns of product peptides for each enzyme. Further comparisons of the proteinases using synthetic peptide substrates with variations in size and in substituents at the P2′ site again showed marked kinetic differences. Although these two matrix metalloproteinases seem similar in that they are both gelatinolytic and can degrade a nearly identical battery of macromolecular matrix components including type IV collagen, it is clear from these results that they are very different enzymatically. Since the regulatory portions of gelatinases A and B differ markedly, it has been assumed that the enzymes serve the same function, but respond to different stimuli. The differences in substrate specificity described herein suggest that their proposed physiological roles may require reevaluation.