Abstract
The classification and the regulatory requirement among U.S., E.U., Japan and China were summarized and compared for the immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization products. The results indicate that:the regulatory classifications of the related products are higher in Japan and China, than U.S.and E.U.; the classification and regulatory requirement are adjusted more flexibly in the centralized system. The difference was discussed and accordingly some suggestions and implications were given for the China's regulation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
