Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the life cycle costs of lightweight and thermally massive building enclosures designed to meet the prescriptive requirements of the 2011 National Energy Code of Canada for Buildings (NECB) in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Nine enclosure systems matched to three buildings (office, school, and apartment) were designed to meet the NECB requirements. Energy costs were estimated from local energy prices and hygrothermal analyses conducted using WUFI Plus. Construction and maintenance costs were estimated using “bids” from local contractors and RS Means cost data. Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was carried out and the enclosures were compared based on equivalent annual cost. LCCA demonstrated that the high initial cost of heavier materials is largely offset by greater durability and reduced sensitivity to moisture. Despite relatively low initial costs, EIFS on stud framing was shown to have very high life cycle costs if not properly maintained.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
