Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare two libraries dedicated to the Markov chain Monte Carlo method: pystan and numpyro. In the comparison, we mainly focused on the agreement of estimated latent parameters and the performance of sampling using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method in Bayesian item response theory (IRT). Bayesian 1PL-IRT and 2PL-IRT were implemented with pystan and numpyro. Then, the Bayesian 1PL-IRT and 2PL-IRT were applied to two types of medical data obtained from a published article. The same prior distributions of latent parameters were used in both pystan and numpyro. Estimation results of latent parameters of 1PL-IRT and 2PL-IRT were compared between pystan and numpyro. Additionally, the computational cost of the Markov chain Monte Carlo method was compared between the two libraries. To evaluate the computational cost of IRT models, simulation data were generated from the medical data and numpyro. For all the combinations of IRT types (1PL-IRT or 2PL-IRT) and medical data types, the mean and standard deviation of the estimated latent parameters were in good agreement between pystan and numpyro. In most cases, the sampling time using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method was shorter in numpyro than that in pystan. When the large-sized simulation data were used, numpyro with a graphics processing unit was useful for reducing the sampling time. Numpyro and pystan were useful for applying the Bayesian 1PL-IRT and 2PL-IRT. Our results show that the two libraries yielded similar estimation result and that regarding to sampling time, the fastest libraries differed based on the dataset size.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.