Abstract
The aim of this study was to fabricate bioresorbable polylactide (PLA) membranes by 3D printing and compare their properties to those of the membranes fabricated by the conventional method and compare the effect of different pore sizes on the properties of the 3D-printed membranes. PLA membranes with three different pore sizes (large pore-479 μm, small pore-273 μm, and no pore) were 3D printed, and membranes fabricated using the conventional solvent casting method were used as the control group. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and micro-computed tomography (µ-CT) were taken to observe the morphology and obtain the porosity of the four groups. A tensile test was performed to compare the tensile strength, elastic modulus, and elongation at break of the membranes. Preosteoblast cells were cultured on the membranes for 1, 3 and 7 days, followed by a WST assay and SEM, to examine the cell proliferation on different groups. As a result, the 3D-printed membranes showed superior mechanical properties to those of the solvent cast membranes, and the 3D-printed membranes exhibited different advantageous mechanical properties depending on the different pore sizes. The various fabrication methods and pore sizes did not have significantly different effects on cell growth. It is proven that 3D printing is a promising method for the fabrication of customized barrier membranes used in GBR/GTR.
Highlights
Guided bone/tissue regenerations (GBR/GTRs) have been widely used as treatments for alveolar bone augmentation and periodontal defects
The tensile strengths decreased as Figure shows representative stress-strain curves ofsignificant the tensiledifferences tests of thewere prepared membranes, the pore size3 increased from NP to SP
55shows the values test after cell proliferation on theTest prepared membranes
Summary
Guided bone/tissue regenerations (GBR/GTRs) have been widely used as treatments for alveolar bone augmentation and periodontal defects. GBR/GTR involves the use of a barrier membrane to impede the ingrowth of soft tissue into defect sites and promote periodontal tissue or bone regeneration. GBR/GTR membranes are typically classified as either bioresorbable or non-bioresorbable membranes. Bioresorbable membranes are most commonly used because they do not require secondary surgery to extract the membrane after bone healing. Polylactide (PLA) membranes are representative bioresorbable membranes and have been commercialized for a long time [1,2]. PLA exhibits various advantageous features, including low degradation rate [3], safe degradation products (carbon dioxide and water) [4], good biocompatibility, Materials 2019, 12, 1718; doi:10.3390/ma12101718 www.mdpi.com/journal/materials
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
