Abstract

Foragers process information they gain from their surroundings to assess the risk from predators and balance it with the resources in their environment. Measuring these perceived risks from the perspective of the forager can produce a heatmap or their “fear” in the environments, a so-called “landscape of fear” (LOF). In an intercontinental comparison of rodents from the Mojave and Negev Deserts, we set to compare families that are used regularly as examples of convergent evolution, heteromyid and gerbilline respectively. Using a LOF spatial-analysis on data collected from common garden experiments in a semi-natural arena we asked: (1) do all four species understand the risk similarly in the exact same physical environment; (2) does relative relation between species affect the way species draw their LOFs, or does the evolutionary niche of a species have a greater impact on its LOF?; and (3) does predator facilitation between vipers and barn owls cause similar changes to the shape of the measured LOFs. For stronger comparative power we mapped the LOF of the rodents under two levels of risk: low risk (snakes only) and high risk (snakes and barn owls). We found concordance in the way all four species assessed risk in the arena. However, the patterns observed in the LOFs of each rodent family were different, and the way the topographic shape of the LOF changed when owls were introduced varied by species. Specifically, gerbils were more sensitive to owl-related risk than snakes and at the opposite correct for heteromyids. Our findings suggest that the community and environment in which a species evolved has a strong impact on the strategies said animals employ. We also conclude, that given the homogenous landscape we provide in our arena and the non- homogenous patterns of LOF maps, risk assessment can be independent of the physical conditions under which the animals find themselves.

Highlights

  • Fear is defined as a psychological emotion that drives anti-predator responses of an individual animal to risk related information it collects from its environment (Laundré et al, 2010; Clinchy et al, 2013)

  • We present here a large biogeographical comparison of convergent species from different genera to test whether physical and morphological convergence leads to behavioral convergence in those species, in their landscape of fear (LOF) and the way these change under variations in predation risk within a semi-natural arena

  • This series of experiments applied the LOF, not as a theoretical model of spatial avoidance (Laundré et al, 2001), but as a measurable property of tradeoffs perceived by a population

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fear is defined as a psychological emotion that drives anti-predator responses of an individual animal to risk related information it collects from its environment (Laundré et al, 2010; Clinchy et al, 2013). This definition stands in contrast with the vague term of psychological emotion This translates to the solution of a game theoretic model balancing the tradeoffs of resources, energetic and reproductive, and safety (Brown et al, 1999; Bleicher, 2017). Those strategic responses, when measured on the physical landscape can provide a visualization of the way a population of individuals perceives the risk in the landscape in form of a topographic (or heat) map, a landscape of fear (LOF; Laundré et al, 2001, 2010). Employing the LOF framework in such a comparison permits an investigation of how the lethality of historical predators has impacted the current space-use and decision-making of species

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.