Comparative Study of Surgical Outcomes of Occipitocervical and Atlantoaxial Fusion for Retro-Odontoid Pseudotumor

Abstract

To compare the surgical and radiographic outcomes of occipitocervical fusion (OCF) with those of atlantoaxial fusion (AAF) in patients with cervical myelopathy caused by retroodontoid pseudotumors (ROPs). This retrospective, comparative study included 26 patients; 12 underwent occipitocervical fusion (OCF) (group O) and 14 retroodontoid pseudotumor (AAF) (group A) with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Neurologic outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. Radiologic assessment included the maximum anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the anteroposterior-retroodontoid pseudotumor (AP-ROP), C2-7 angle, O-C2 angle, C1-2 angle, atlantodental interval (ADI), range of motion (ROM) of the ADI, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA), and T1 slope. Global spinal alignments (pelvic incidence [PI] minus lumbar lordosis [LL] [PI-LL], pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and C7 sagittal vertical axis) were also compared between the groups. Both groups had equally good clinical outcomes with equal complication rates. Three patients had a three-level fusion, 5 cases had a four-level fusion, and 4 cases had more than five-level fusion in group O. All cases had a single-level fusion in group A. Surgical time was significantly shorter in group A. AP-ROP was significantly downsized postoperatively in both groups and was more prominent in group O. C2-7 SVA was significantly increased and C2-7A ROM was significantly reduced in group O at the final follow-up. The PI-LL showed a significant increase in group O at the final follow-up. Although OCF and AAF were similarly effective for cervical myelopathy with ROP, AAF was less invasive, and spinal alignment was better maintained postoperatively in AAF than OCF.