Abstract
Background Diabetic maculopathy is a serious consequence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) that greatly affects the visual acuity. Diabetic macular edema (DME) and diabetic macular ischemia (DMI) are major causes of vision affection in diabetic patients. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in evaluation of diabetic maculopathy. Patients and methods This comparative cross-sectional study was performed on 87 eyes of 54 patients with type I or type II diabetes, older than 18 years old with any diabetic retinal changes, and 108 eyes of 54 control subjects. An ocular examination was performed as well as color fundus photography, FA, and OCTA. Investigations were done on the same day. FA and OCTA findings were summarized and compared. Results The mean age of the patients was 59.4±8.5 years. OCTA was statistically significantly superior to FA in diagnosing DMI. The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was ischemic (enlarged) in 74 (85.06%) eyes by OCTA compared with only 46 (52.87%) eyes by FA, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.001). In addition, OCTA detected microaneurysms significantly more than FA (P = 0.001). The mean FAZ area of the control eyes by OCTA was significantly less than in the ischemic eyes (U = 56.602, P < 0.001), while the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) vascular density (VD) and the deep capillary plexus (DCP) VD in the control eyes was statistically significantly higher than in the ischemic eyes (U = 36.984, P < 0.001, and U = 35.955, P < 0.001, respectively). FA showed diffuse leakage (edema) at the macula as the most common pattern of DME that was detected in 37.9% of the eyes followed by focal macular leakage in 18.4% of the eyes and cystoid leakage in 8% of the eyes while 35.5% of the eyes showed no macular edema. Conclusion OCTA is a cornerstone in DMI diagnosis both qualitatively and quantitatively. In addition, it is essential in evaluating the deep retinal vasculature, while FA is essential in diabetic retinopathy grading and in the diagnosis of DME in a qualitative manner. Both investigations are complementary to each other in diabetic maculopathy evaluation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.