Comparative outcomes of single condylar replacement and total knee arthroplasty in elderly patients with knee osteoarthritis: A controlled clinical study.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with 3D printing guild plate by comparing with conventional TKA. Methods From May 2014 to September 2014, 40 patients suffered primary unilateral TKA were received, in which there were 11 males and 29 females, aged from 57 to 82 years with an average age of 68.5±6.3 years. The subjects were divided into two groups randomly. One group was treated with TKA with 3D printing guild plate while the other group was treated with the conventional TKA. The blood loss, operation time, post-operative Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, range of motion (ROM), lower limb mechanical alignment and incidence of complication were compared with insignificant differences. Results The operation time in the 3D printing TKA group (103.4±11.7 min) was lower than that in the conventional TKA group (124.5±21.6 min), which was statistically significant (t=3.838, P=0.000). The blood loss in the 3D printing TKA group (370.2±96.0 ml) was lower than that in the conventional TKA group (510.0±235.9 ml), which was statistically significant (t=2.454, P=0.019). The post-operative ROM of knee in the 3D printing TKA group was 104.3°±15.5° and that in the conventional TKA group was 103.5°±12.5° (t=0.169, P=0.867). HSS scores in the 3D printing TKA group and in the conventional TKA group were 88.5±5.7 and 89.4±4.8, which was statistically insignificant (t=-0.633, P=0.530). Mechanical alignment in the 3D printing TKA group was 2.9°±1.1° and that in the conventional TKA group was 3.0°±0.9°, which was not statistically significant (t=-0.317, P=0.753). No obvious complication occurred in two groups. Conclusion TKA with 3D printing guild plate has similar results to conventional TKA in HSS score, mechanical alignment and ROM of knee, but it shortens operation time and decreases the blood loss. Key words: Arthroplasty, replacement, knee; Imaging, three-dimensional; Randomized controlled trial

Complications After Concomitant Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty in Elderly Patients

HURWA robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves component positioning and alignment \u2013 A prospective randomized and multicenter study

To compare the effectiveness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the treatment of severe medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA). A clinical data of 69 patients (69 knees), who underwent joint replacement due to severe medial compartment OA between February 2015 and September 2018 and met the selection criteria, was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 38 cases were treated with UKA (UKA group) and 31 cases with TKA (TKA group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, course of disease, lesion side, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Feller score, range of motion of knee, physiological and psychological scores of short-form 12 health survey scale (SF-12) between the two groups ( P>0.05). The femorotibial angle (FTA) of TKA group was bigger than that of UKA group, and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was smaller, showing significant differences ( P<0.05). The operative time, incision length, blood loss, time for flexion 90°, ambulation time, hospital stay, and incidence of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity were recorded and compared between the two groups. The VAS score, HSS score, WOMAC score, Feller score, range of motion, and physiological and psychological scores of SF-12 were used to evaluate patients' quality of life. FTA, HKA, and prosthesis looseness were observed by X-ray films. Kaplan-Merier survival analysis was used to evaluate the survival rate of prosthesis. All operations were successfully completed in both groups. Compared with TKA group, UKA group had shorter incision length, longer operative time, and less blood loss ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in time for flexion 90°, ambulation time, hospital stay, and the incidence of deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity between the two groups ( P>0.05). The incisions in both groups healed by first intention. During follow-up, 3 patients in the UKA group and 1 patient in the TKA group developed mild anterior knee pain. Patients were followed up (30.7±9.6) months in the UKA group and (34.9±8.7) months in the TKA group, and the difference was not significant ( t=-1.832, P=0.071). At last follow-up, there were significant differences in the HSS score, Feller score, WOMAC score, range of motion, VAS score, and physiological and psychological scores of SF-12 between pre- and post-operation ( P<0.05). The range of motion in the UKA group was bigger than that in the TKA group ( Z=-2.666, P=0.008), and there was no significant difference in the other indexes between the two groups ( P>0.05). X-ray films showed that the alignment of the two groups recovered well, and the FTA and HKA of the two groups were improved at 1 week after operation ( P<0.05). No radiolucency was found around the prosthesis during follow-up, no prosthesis loosening and meniscal bearing dislocation occurred. The survival rates of the prostheses in the two groups were 100%. For severe medial compartment OA, the early survival rates of the two prostheses are similar, but UKA has less traumatic, can preserve the normal structure of the knee, and the range of motion of the knee after operation is significantly better than TKA.

Background Knee arthroplasty surgeries are in ever-increasing demand. With unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), patients may benefit from a higher range of flexion and a better Knee Society Score (KSS). Aim In this study, we compared the short-term clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and UKA using the patient-specific templating (PST) technique. Methods Two groups of 20 knees each were divided into UKA and TKA groups depending on the Oxford criteria of UKA. Only patients with medial compartmental osteoarthritis were included. KSS, functional knee score (FKS), and ROF were assessed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Results The TKA group has shown a significant improvement compared to the UKA group in KSS (MD = 39.35 vs. 31.2, respectively, p=0.003). Both TKA and UKA have shown no significant difference concerning both the FKS (MD = 32 and 31.75, respectively, p=0.926) and ROF (MD = 10.25 and 7.25, respectively, p=0.072). Discussion. The higher improvement of KSS in the TKA group can be attributed to the fact that patients in the TKA had significantly worse KSS preoperatively. Also, the small improvement in ROF in the UKA group might be related to their wider preoperative ROF. Conclusion Preoperatively, the TKA group had lower KSS and ROF compared to UKA. The improvement of KSS from preoperative to postoperative was more significant in TKA. However, the TKA group has shown less range of flexion postoperatively.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasingly performed in elderly patients with osteoarthritis, yet preoperative frailty is associated with adverse outcomes. Limited data exist from South Asian regions like Pakistan, where resource constraints and high osteoarthritis prevalence may influence these associations. To evaluate the association between preoperative frailty, assessed by the modified Frailty Index, and postoperative complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), 90-day readmission rates, and 1-year functional recovery in elderly Pakistani patients undergoing primary TKA. This retrospective cohort study analyzed de-identified records from Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan (from January 2015 to September 2025). Patients aged ≥ 65 years with primary unilateral TKA for osteoarthritis were included. Frail patients (n = 512) were propensity score-matched 1:4 to non-frail controls (n = 2048) using nearest-neighbor matching with a caliper of 0.1. Propensity score estimation followed established methodological standards. Logistic regression, t-tests, χ 2 tests, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used, with P < 0.05 denoting significance. Sensitivity analyses addressed alternative modified Frailty Index thresholds, matching overlap and missing data. Post-matching, groups were balanced. Frail patients had higher composite complications [21.1% vs 9.2%; adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 2.61, 95%CI: 2.05-3.32; P < 0.001], including surgical site infection (OR = 3.12, 95%CI: 2.18-4.46; P < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (OR = 2.85, 95%CI: 1.92-4.23; P < 0.001), and pulmonary embolism (OR = 4.02, 95%CI: 2.45-6.59; P < 0.001). LOS was prolonged (5.6 ± 1.9 days vs 3.9 ± 1.5 days; P < 0.001), readmissions increased (17% vs 4%; OR = 4.74, 95%CI: 3.56-6.31; P < 0.001), and 1-year Knee Society Score was lower (75.5 ± 10.2 vs 85.1 ± 8.1; P < 0.001), with smaller delta Knee Society Score (30.3 ± 11.4 vs 39.0 ± 10.2; P < 0.001), approaching the minimal clinically important difference of approximately 9 points. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness. Preoperative frailty is associated with increased complications, extended LOS, higher readmissions, and impaired functional recovery in elderly TKA patients in this Pakistani cohort. These findings are most directly applicable to tertiary care centers in Pakistan with comparable patient complexity and resource availability. Extrapolation to primary care or markedly different healthcare systems requires further validation. Routine frailty screening may aid risk stratification and perioperative management in similar settings, considering regional challenges such as high tuberculosis prevalence.

AIMTo compare infection rates in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures using antibiotic impregnated bone cement (AIBC) to those rates in procedures not using AIBC.METHODSA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in search for randomized controlled trials/studies (RCTs) pertaining to the field of antibiotic AIBC vs non-AIBC groups in both primary and revision TKA procedures. The primary literature search performed was to identify all RCTs that assessed AIBC in primary and revision TKA procedures. This search was done strictly through the PubMed database using the article “filters” setting that identified and separated all RCTs from the overall search. The original search was “Primary/revision total knee arthroplasty using AIBC”. Other key terms and phrases were included in the search as well. Eligible articles that were used in the “results” of this review met the following criteria: (1) Involved primary or revision TKA procedures (for any reason); (2) included TKA outcome infection rate information; (3) analyzed an AIBC group vs a non-AIBC control group; (4) were found through the RCT filter or hand search in PubMed; and (5) published 1985-2017. Exclusion criteria was as follows: (1) Patients that were not undergoing primary or revision TKA procedures; (2) articles that did not separate total hip arthroplasity (THA) vs TKA results if both hip and knee revisions were evaluated; (3) papers that did not follow up on clinical outcomes of the procedure; (4) extrapolation of data was not possible given published results; (5) knee revisions not done on human patients; (6) studies that were strictly done on THAs; (7) articles that were not found through the RCT filter or through hand search in PubMed; (8) articles that did not evaluate AIBC used in a prosthesis or a spacer during revision; (9) articles that did not compare an AIBC group vs a non-AIBC control group; and (10) articles that were published before 1985.RESULTSIn total, 11 articles were deemed eligible for this analysis. Nine of the 11 studies dealt with primary TKA procedures comparing AIBC to non-AIBC treatment. The other two studies dealt with revision TKA procedures that compared such groups. From these papers, 4092 TKA procedures were found. 3903 of these were primary TKAs, while 189 were revision TKAs. Of the 3903 primary TKAs, 1979 of these used some form of AIBC while 1924 were part of a non-AIBC control group. Of the 189 revision TKAs, 96 of these used some form of AIBC while 93 were part of a non-AIBC control group. Average follow-up times of 47.2 mo and 62.5 mo were found in primary and revision groups respectively. A two-tailed Fisher’s exact test was done to check if infection rates differed significantly between the groups. In the primary TKA group, a statistically significant difference between AIBC and non-AIBC groups was not found (AIBC infection rate = 23/1979, non-AIBC infection rate = 35/1924, P = 0.1132). In the revision TKA group, a statistically significant difference between the groups was found (AIBC infection rate = 0/96, non-AIBC infection rate = 7/93, P = 0.0062). No statistically significant differences existed in Knee Society Scores, Hospital for Special Surgery Scores, or Loosening Rates.CONCLUSIONAIBC did not have a significant effect on primary TKA infection rates. AIBC did have a significant effect on revision TKA infection rates.

Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been provento be very effective for long-term pain relief in the degenerativeknee. Few studies have investigated short-term clinicaland functional outcomes between the cemented and cementlessTKA. The specific aim of this study was to assess the potentialdifference of functional outcomes in the early postoperativeperiod between these two surgical options usingthe Knee Society Score (KSS) and range of motion (ROM).&#x0D; Methods. A total of 164 knees that had undergone TKA by a singlesurgeon at a single institution between 2007 and 2010 were reviewed.Three different TKA prosthetic designs (cruciate retaining(CR), posterior stabilized (PS) and cruciate substituting (CS))were included. Data collection included patient demographics,pre- and post-operative ROM, and pre- and post-operative KSSat each visit (1.5 months, 3 months, and 12 months). Two separateKSS scores were assigned: functional score and clinical score.&#x0D; Results. Sixty-seven knees underwent cemented TKA and 97knees underwent cementless TKA. No significant differencewas recognized in either age or body mass index for thesetwo TKA groups. The cementless group showed a significantearly ROM improvement after 1.5 months post-operative (p &lt;0.05), while the cemented group showed ROM improvementonly after three months post-operative. No significant differencewas detected in terms of KSS between the cemented andcementless TKA groups at each measured time period. Bothgroups showed marked KSS improvement (cemented: 135%,cementless: 125%) after 1.5 months post-operative and theKSS seemed to be stabilized after three months post-operativefor both groups (cemented: p = 0.36; cementless: p = 0.07).&#x0D; Conclusions. There was a significant early ROM improvementfor the cementless TKA group compared to the cementedTKA group, but no statistical significant difference was notedin KSS in the early post-operative period when comparing cementedand cementless TKA groups. The findings provide evidencethat cementless TKA patients can undergo an identicalpost-operative protocol to cemented TKA, without concernsabout implant stability or function. KS J Med 2016;9(4):93-98.

Background:The application of second-generation constrained condylar knee (CCK) prostheses has not been widely studied. This retrospective study was carried out to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a second-generation CCK prosthesis for complex primary or revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Methods:In total, 51 consecutive TKAs (47 patients) were performed between June 2003 and June 2013 using second-generation modular CCK prostheses. The follow-up was conducted at 3rd day, 1st, 6th, and 12th months postoperatively and later annually. Anteroposterior (AP), lateral, skyline, and long-standing AP radiographs of the affected knees were taken. The Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) Knee Score, the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), the Knee Society Function Score (KSFS), and range of motion (ROM) were also recorded. Heteroscedastic two-tailed Student's t-tests were used to compare the HSS score and the Knee Society score between primary and revision TKAs. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:Four knees (two patients) were lost to follow-up, and 47 knees (31 primary TKAs and 16 revision TKAs) had a mean follow-up time of 5.5 years. The mean HSS score improved from 51.1 ± 15.0 preoperatively to 85.3 ± 8.4 points at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). Similar results were observed in terms of the KSKS and KSFS, which improved from 26.0 ± 13.0 to 80.0 ± 12.2 and from 40.0 ± 15.0 to 85.0 ± 9.3 points, respectively (P < 0.05). No significant difference in the HSS, KSKS, KSFS, or ROM was found between primary and revision TKAs (P > 0.05). Two complications were observed in the revision TKA group (one intraoperative distal femur fracture and one recurrence of infection) while one complication (infection) was observed in the primary TKA group. No prosthesis loosening, joint dislocation, patella problems, tibial fracture, or nerve injury were observed. Radiolucent lines were observed in 4% of the knees without progressive osteolysis.Conclusions:Second-generation modular CCK prostheses are a safe and practical treatment for both primary and revision knees that cannot be balanced. However, further studies focusing on different types of constrained prostheses are required to validate these results.

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to assess the clinical and radiological results of patients who underwent patellar retention or resurfacing for moderate or severe patellar articular defects during total knee arthroplasty and evaluate the clinical efficacy of patellar resurfacing according to the articular defect of the patella.Materials and MethodsFrom May 2003 to March 2006, 252 patients (277 cases) underwent total knee arthroplasty by one surgeon. Intraoperatively, we divided these patients into a moderate articular defect group (50-75%: group I) and a severe articular defect group (75-100%: group II) and randomly performed patellar resurfacing. The average age was 67.2 years. There were 234 female and 17 male patients. The average follow-up period was 74.6 months. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using the Knee Society (KS) knee score. Functional score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, Feller patellar score and range of motion (ROM). Radiological outcomes were analyzed using the congruence angle, Insall-Salvati ratio and patella tilt angle.ResultsThe KS knee score and functional score at the last follow-up were 84.4/73.1 in the retention group and 85.2/71.8 in the resurfacing group (p=0.80, p=0.63) in group I. In group II, the values were 82.1/75.1 and 87.0/71.2, respectively (p=0.51, p=0.26). The HSS score and Feller patella score were 86.7/20.3 in the retention group and 84.3/21.7 in the resurfacing group (p=0.31, p=0.29) in group I. In group II, the values were 91.6/21.2 and 85.5/22.1, respectively (p=0.37/p=0.30). The knee ROM (p=0.36/p=0.41), congruence angle (p=0.22/p=0.16), Insall-Salvati ratio (p=0.16/p=0.21) and patella tilt angle (p=0.12/p=0.19) were not statistically different between the two groups.ConclusionsIn this study, we could not find any correlations between the degree of patellar articular defect and patellar resurfacing in terms of the clinical and radiological results. Therefore, patellar articular defects is thought to be less meaningful in determining patellar resurfacing.

ABSTRACTObjectiveThe gait analysis of patients after surgery for tumors around the knee joint relies on the use of a three‐dimensional motion capture system. However, obtaining long‐term, free‐standing, real‐world gait data with three‐dimensional gait analysis is challenging. In this study, we utilized a portable gait analyzer to collect gait data from patients who underwent rotating hinge knee megaprosthesis (RHK) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), this study aims to compare via gait analysis patients who underwent megaprosthesis with patients with TKA.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on eight patients with knee bone tumors (RHK group) and ten patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent standard TKA (TKA group) from January 2018 to January 2022. Gait analysis, was conducted using the Intelligent Device for Energy Expenditure and Activity (IDEEA), and the results were compared with those of a healthy control group. The lower limb alignment of the RHK and TKA groups was evaluated, and the KSS scores of the two groups were collected and compared. Energy consumption during a 20‐m walk was measured and compared among the RHK, TKA, and healthy control groups using one‐way ANOVA. Paired t‐tests were used to compare the operated and nonoperated limbs within groups.ResultsAll patients exhibited slower walking speeds and cadence than the healthy control participants (p < 0.01), While no significant differences were found between the RHK and TKA groups. The single support time (521.15 ± 94.56 ms) of the RHK‐operated limb was significantly shorter than that of the nonoperated limb (576.53 ± 77.40 ms, p = 0.004). The pulling acceleration of the RHK group (0.71 ± 0.27 G) was lower than that of the TKA group (1.04 ± 0.31 G, p = 0.029). The push‐off angle in the RHK group (24.91° ± 10.91°) was significantly greater than that in the TKA group (10.64° ± 5.41°, p = 0.007). The RHK group showed significant differences between the operated and nonoperated limbs in terms of swing power, ground impact, footfall, and push‐off. The RHK (0.03 ± 0.01 kcal/min/kg) and TKA (0.029 ± 0.01 kcal/min/kg) groups had significantly greater energy expenditures than did the healthy control group (0.02 ± 0.00 kcal/min/kg, p < 0.05). The comparison of HKA angles and KSS scores between the TKA and RHK groups showed statistically significant differences.ConclusionA portable gait analyzer appears to be suitable for evaluating the effects of RHK. RHK patients demonstrate more pronounced gait abnormalities than TKA patients, reflected in greater energy expenditure, implying reduced walking efficiency. This suggests the need for increased energy expenditure in RHK patients to compensate for abnormal knee joint conditions during walking and maintain body balance.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the third most common diagnosis made by general practitioners in older patients. The aim of this study was to compare the function scores of different surgeries in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Cohort studies about different surgical treatments for KOA were included with a comprehensive search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The standard mean difference (SMD) value was evaluated and the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve was drawn with a combination of direct and indirect evidence. A total of 265 eligible patients were enrolled and served as the nonoperative treatment group, osteotomy group, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) group, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) group, and arthroscopic surgery group. Before surgery, 6 months after surgery, 1 year after surgery and 5 years after surgery, the hospital for special surgery (HSS) knee score, Lysholm score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and American knee society score (KSS) were recorded. A total of 9 cohort studies including 954 patients with KOA were finally enrolled into the study. The network-meta analysis revealed that osteotomy and UKA treatments showed a better efficacy on improving the function score. Our cohort study further confirmed that, a higher HSS knee score after 1 year and higher Lysholm score after 6 months and 1 year were observed in the osteotomy and UKA groups, while better HSS knee score and KSS after 6 months and 1 year were showed in the osteotomy and TKA groups. In the TKA group, Lysholm score and KSS were higher and WOMAC score was lower after 5 years than other groups. WOMAC score was lowest in the UKA group after 6 months, 1 year and 5 years of surgery. These results provide evidence that function scores of patients with KOA were improved by osteotomy, UKA, TKA, and arthroscopic surgery. And osteotomy and UKA showed better short-term efficacy, while TKA appeared better long-term efficacy.

Subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee (SIFK) causes acute knee pain in adults and often requires surgical management. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are the two most common surgical treatments for SIFK. While both UKA and TKA have their advantages, there is no consensus for SIFK localized on the medial compartment. We hypothesized that patients with SIFK treated with UKA would show superior patient-reported outcomes compared to those who underwent TKA. A total of 90 patients with SIFK located medially were included in the TKA (n = 45) and UKA (n = 45) groups. Size of SIFK lesions were measured on MR images. Patient reported outcomes in the form of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Hospital Special Surgery (HSS) scores, and Knee Society Scores (KSS) were assessed preoperatively, postoperative 6, 12 months, and at the final follow-up. There were no differences in the size of the SIFK lesion between two groups. At 6 months, WOMAC score was better in the UKA group than the TKA group (p < .01). Both groups had a significant improvement in WOMAC, HSS, and KSS scores at the final follow-up compared to preoperative scores. The UKA group had better range of motion of the knee preoperatively and postoperatively than the TKA group (p < .01 and p < .01). UKA group showed a higher relative risk than the TKA group in terms of complications (RR = 3.0) but with no statistical significance (P = 0.31). Unicompartmental arthroplasty and total joint arthroplasty can produce successful outcomes in patients with SIFK with proper patient selection, regardless of the size of SIFK lesion.

Background: In postoperative analgesia of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in elderly patients, epidural analgesia has been proved to be a highly effective method. The goal of this study was to compare between patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous epidural analgesia (CEA) for their efficacy of analgesia, analgesic requirement and side effects after TKA in elderly patients. Methods: Eighty eight elderly patients over 60 years, undergoing TKA were randomly allocated to PCEA and CEA group. The PCEA group could demand a 2 ml bolus of 0.1% levobupivacaine and 0.0002% fentanyl solution with a lockout interval of 8 minutes, a total dose limit of 15 ml/h and a basal infusion rate of 3 ml/h. The CEA group received a continuous basal infusion of 5 ml/h of the same solution. The pain scores (verbal numerical rating scale, VNRS) at rest and coughing, analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction and side effects were recorded immediately before and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 hour after the initiation of epidural analgesia. Results: VNRS revealed no intergroup differences at each time interval, and were not exceeding 3 in both groups. The PCEA group (n = 44) revealed significantly less analgesic consumption compared to the CEA group (n = 44, P

Peripheral nerve block is the main analgesic technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in elderly patients. Accurate delivery of the needle tip to the target nerve under ultrasound-guided is a prerequisite for successful nerve block. Failed needle-tip positioning in sciatic nerve (SN) or medial femoral cutaneous nerve (MFCN) block can be due to anatomical structure shadow. The aim of the study was to compare curved and straight needles in regard to the time needed to perform the nerve block for TKA in elderly patients. One hundred patients aged 65 to 80 years and ASA II-III, BMI 18-30 kg/m2, who underwent general anesthesia for unilateral TKA received the nerve block under ultrasound guidance after surgery, were included in this study. All patients were randomly divided into two groups (N.=50): straight needle group (Group S) and curved needle group (Group C). The primary outcome measure was the time needed to successfully perform the nerve block. Secondary outcomes included the number of attempts and needle redirections to achieve nerve blockade, as well as the satisfaction of patients and anesthesiologists. Compared with group S, the performance time was shorter in group C (488.0±44.9 vs. 517.8±42.1 P=0.001). The procedural pain score was less in group C (1.8±0.4 vs. 2.4±0.6, P=0.000). The satisfaction score of the anesthesiologist (3.4±0.8 vs. 2.4±0.6, P=0.000) and patients (3.4±0.7 vs. 1.9±0.6, P=0.000) were higher in the curved needle group compared with the straight needle group. The use of a curved needle can reduce the time required to perform the nerve block, with reduction in the number of attempts and needle redirections. Curved needle also resulted in lesser procedural pain and higher satisfaction compared with the straight needle.