Abstract

Introduction: Cosmetic expectations have increased with time and pigmentation of gingiva is a negative factor in an otherwise acceptable “smile window”. Amongst the various treatment modalities for depigmentation like scalpel technique, cryosurgery, laser, abrasion etc, there seems to be a need to compare efficacy of cryosurgery with TFE and Diode laser. Objective: The objective was to compare the efficacy of cryosurgery with 1,1,1,2 tetrafluroethane and Diode Laser for the treatment of gingival pigmentation. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled split mouth study was conducted for 10 patients with gingival pigmentation, wherein one quadrant was treated with the TFE cooled swab( Group A) and the other quadrant was treated using diode laser (980nm at 1W) (Group B). Pre and post treatment photographs, VAS pain scores, were evaluated by the clinician at 4 days, 1 week, 1month and also number of analgesics required to be taken by the patient following treatment with both the techniques. Results: Clinically significant results were seen in both the groups. Mild erythema was seen immediately after the application of cryogen following which a whitish slough could be separated from the underlying connective tissue at fourth day. In group B, a white fibrin slough was seen 24hrs after the procedure. The healing was uneventful and complete epithelialization takes place in 3-4 weeks in both the groups. Though, the patient acceptance was good for both the procedures, mild pain and discomfort was experienced by the patient in group B. Conclusion: Depigmentation of gingival melanin hyperpigmentation by cryosurgery using TFE and diode laser were found to be an effective procedures, however the patient compliance and acceptance was greater in Tetrafluoroethane cryosurgery when compared to the Diode laser. Keywords: Cryosurgery, Laser, Depigmentation, Tetrafluroethane.

Highlights

  • Cosmetic expectations have increased with time and pigmentation of gingiva is a negative factor in an otherwise acceptable “smile window”

  • After taking the written informed consent from the patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, depigmentation procedure was performed using diode laser in one quadrant and cryosurgery with TFE in other quadrant which was selected with a toss of coin

  • The visual analogue score (VAS)[11] for pain was recorded immediately and at 4th day postoperatively by asking the patient to mark on a line having scores 010.wound healing following for both the procedures was recorded using the wound healing index by Landry et al[12] by another examiner who was blinded for the treatment done at 4th day, 7th day and one month after the procedure. (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cosmetic expectations have increased with time and pigmentation of gingiva is a negative factor in an otherwise acceptable “smile window”. Amongst the various treatment modalities for depigmentation like scalpel technique, cryosurgery, laser, abrasion etc, there seems to be a need to compare efficacy of cryosurgery with TFE and Diode laser. Objective: The objective was to compare the efficacy of cryosurgery with 1,1,1,2 tetrafluroethane and Diode Laser for the treatment of gingival pigmentation. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled split mouth study was conducted for 10 patients with gingival pigmentation, wherein one quadrant was treated with the TFE cooled swab( Group A) and the other quadrant was treated using diode laser (980nm at 1W) (Group B). The patient acceptance was good for both the procedures, mild pain and discomfort was experienced by the patient in group B. Conclusion: Depigmentation of gingival melanin hyperpigmentation by cryosurgery using TFE and diode laser were found to be an effective procedures, the patient compliance and acceptance was greater in Tetrafluoroethane cryosurgery when compared to the Diode laser

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.