Abstract

BackgroundFascial plane blocks provide effective analgesia after midline laparotomy; however, the most efficacious technique has not been determined. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to synthesise the evidence with respect to pain, opioid consumption, and adverse events. MethodsWe searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Scopus databases for studies comparing commonly used non-neuraxial analgesic techniques for midline laparotomy in adult patients. The co-primary outcomes of the study were 24-h cumulative opioid consumption and 24-h resting pain score, reported as i.v. morphine equivalents and 11-point numerical rating scale, respectively. We performed a frequentist meta-analysis using a random-effects model and a cluster-rank analysis of the co-primary outcomes. ResultsOf 6115 studies screened, 67 eligible studies were included (n=4410). Interventions with the greatest reduction in 24-h cumulative opioid consumption compared with placebo/no intervention were single-injection quadratus lumborum block (sQLB; mean difference [MD] −16.1 mg, 95% confidence interval [CI] −29.9 to −2.3, very low certainty), continuous transversus abdominis plane block (cTAP; MD −14.0 mg, 95% CI −21.6 to −6.4, low certainty), single-injection transversus abdominis plane block (sTAP; MD −13.7 mg, 95% CI −17.4 to −10.0, low certainty), and continuous rectus sheath block (cRSB; MD −13.2 mg, 95% CI −20.3 to −6.1, low certainty). Interventions with the greatest reduction in 24-h resting pain score were cRSB (MD −1.2, 95% CI −1.8 to −0.6, low certainty), cTAP (MD −1.0, 95% CI −1.7 to −0.2, low certainty), and continuous wound infusion (cWI; MD −0.7, 95% CI −1.1 to −0.4, low certainty). Clustered-rank analysis including the co-primary outcomes showed cRSB and cTAP blocks to be the most efficacious interventions. ConclusionsBased on current evidence, continuous rectus sheath block and continuous transversus abdominis plane block were the most efficacious non-neuraxial techniques at reducing 24-h cumulative opioid consumption and 24-h resting pain scores after midline laparotomy (low certainty). Future studies should compare techniques for upper vs lower midline laparotomy and other non-midline abdominal incisions. Clinical trial registrationPROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021269044.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.