Abstract

An open-label, randomized, crossover single-dose study, using two periods and two sequences with a washout period of seven days was conducted to assess the comparative bioavailability of thioctic (alpha-lipoic) acid (ALA) 600 mg formulation and that of a reference formulation. Blood samples were collected up to +6 h post dosing, the plasma was separated, and thioctic acid concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatographic method with single mass spectrometry detection (HPLC-MS) and a lower limit of quantification of 190.1 ng/ml. Mean values of the individual Cmax were 1338.6 ± 751.8 ng/ml and 1215.8 ± 560.5 ng/ml for the test and reference preparations, respectively. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) total area under the curve up to the last measurable concentration (AUCt) was 3510.9 ± 1088.6 ng × h/ml for the test formulation and 3563.5 ± 1374.1 ng × h/ml for the reference formulation. Mean ± SD total area under the curve (AUCinf) was 6925.6 ± 4045.8 ng × h/ml for the test formulation and 7797.1 ± 5963.1 ng × h/ml for the reference preparation. Terminal elimination half-life was 5.68 ± 5.05 h for the test and 6.11 ± 6.15 h for the reference formulations. Time of maximum concentration (tmax) was 1.24 ± 1.23 h for the test and 2.05 ± 1.21 h for the reference formulations. Ninety percent confidence intervals were comprised within the bioequivalence acceptance criteria (80–125%) for all of the parameters analyzed except tmax. The comparison between males and females showed no significant difference for the two drug treatment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.