Abstract

BackgroundAccurate identification of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patient cohorts is essential for a wide range of clinical investigations. Automated phenotyping methods that leverage electronic health records (EHRs) represent a fundamentally new approach cohort identification without current laborious and ungeneralizable generation of phenotyping algorithms. We systematically compared and evaluated the ability of machine learning algorithms and case-control combinations to phenotype acute ischemic stroke patients using data from an EHR.Materials and methodsUsing structured patient data from the EHR at a tertiary-care hospital system, we built and evaluated machine learning models to identify patients with AIS based on 75 different case-control and classifier combinations. We then estimated the prevalence of AIS patients across the EHR. Finally, we externally validated the ability of the models to detect AIS patients without AIS diagnosis codes using the UK Biobank.ResultsAcross all models, we found that the mean AUROC for detecting AIS was 0.963 ± 0.0520 and average precision score 0.790 ± 0.196 with minimal feature processing. Classifiers trained with cases with AIS diagnosis codes and controls with no cerebrovascular disease codes had the best average F1 score (0.832 ± 0.0383). In the external validation, we found that the top probabilities from a model-predicted AIS cohort were significantly enriched for AIS patients without AIS diagnosis codes (60–150 fold over expected).ConclusionsOur findings support machine learning algorithms as a generalizable way to accurately identify AIS patients without using process-intensive manual feature curation. When a set of AIS patients is unavailable, diagnosis codes may be used to train classifier models.

Highlights

  • Accurate identification of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patient cohorts is essential for a wide range of clinical investigations

  • We found that the top probabilities from a model-predicted AIS cohort were significantly enriched for AIS patients without AIS diagnosis codes (60–150 fold over expected)

  • Out of the Columbia University Irving Medical Center (CUIMC) Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW), which has a total of 6.4 million patients, we extracted 4844 stroke service patients, which we found to have a 4–16% false positive rate for stroke through manual review

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Accurate identification of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patient cohorts is essential for a wide range of clinical investigations. While electronic health records (EHR) are an emerging resource that can be used to study stroke patients, identification of stroke patient cohorts using the EHR requires the integration of multiple facets of data, including medical notes, labs, imaging reports, and medical expertise of neurologists This process is often manually performed and time-consuming, and can reveal mis-classification errors [2]. Identifying every AIS patient using these criteria can be difficult due to the inaccuracy and incompleteness of diagnosis recording through insurance billing [3,4,5] This approach prevents the identification of AIS patients until after hospital discharge, thereby limiting the clinical usability of identification algorithms in time-sensitive situations, such as in-hospital care management, research protocol enrollment, or acute treatment

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.