Comparación de hallazgos histeroscópicos vs. histerosalpingográficos en pacientes sometidas a tratamiento de fertilidad

Abstract

Objective: To compare hysteroscopic vs. hysterosalpingographic findings in female patients subject fertility treatment. Methods: Observational, descriptive, retrospective study to determine the causes of infertility, and analytical to evaluate the correspondence of the findings between hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy of women who attended the fertility clinic of the Leopoldo Aguerrevere Clinic between January 2018 and May of 2022. Results: The most frequent causes of infertility were age (52.6%), tubal factor (12.4%) and early ovarian failure (11.7%); 47.4% had two causes of infertility, 44.5% only one and 8.1% three causes. In vitro fertilization (50.4%) was the most commonly used treatment to achieve pregnancy. In hysterosalpingography, 67.9 % normal patients were reported, of the total polyps reported, 5.1 % had one polyp and 4.4 % two polyps. In hysteroscopy, 46 % normal patients were reported, of the total polyps, 30.7 % presented one polyp, 4.4 % two and 0.7 % three polyps. Among the most common findings there was discordance between hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy, with coincidences being less than 50%. The Kappa index indicated that the correspondence between the two studies was low. Conclusions: hysteroscopy is a necessary technique for the study of endouterine disorders in infertile women, providing information on uterine endocavitary lesions, which may not be appreciated with hysterosalpingography, the latter can be used for presumptive diagnosis of endometrial pathology and evaluation of permeability of the fallopian tubes