Abstract
The use of the Institute of jurors in Russia has been expanded since June 1, 2018. Today, courts with the participation of jurors consider criminal cases in regional courts and equivalent ones, as well as in district courts. At the same time, legislative innovations also affected the number of citizens who are members of the jury. These changes dictate the need for a scientific understanding of what happened, including the development of proposals aimed at optimizing the work of courts, representatives of the state prosecution and defense with a jury. In this regard, the purpose of the study is to improve the organization of criminal proceedings carried out by a court with the participation of jurors, taking into account the psychological characteristics of the judge, the public Prosecutor, the defense lawyer and the jury. In the course of the work, the author considers the results of psychological and legal research, which in one way or another affects the communicative features of participants in criminal proceedings. The paper makes the following main conclusions: a) to establish in the normative legal acts of the Judicial Department the main requirements for the list of property and technical means that provide comfortable conditions for jurors during the trial; b) to conduct systematic work with the staff of judges and employees of the court interacting with jurors in accordance with the recommendations given in the article; c) provide judges and employees of the court with methodological guidance concerning communication with a jury on work issues.
Highlights
Key word: jury trial, communication barriers, psychology in the jury trial, expanding the use of the jury Institute, public prosecution, defense in the jury trial, organization of the court's activities
Legislative innovations affected the number of citizens who are members of the jury
These changes dictate the need for a scientific understanding of what happened, including the development of proposals aimed at optimizing the work of courts, representatives of the state prosecution and defense with a jury
Summary
Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», г. Применение института присяжных заседателей в России с 1 июня 2018 г. В связи с этим целью исследования является совершенствование организации уголовного судопроизводства, осуществляемого судом с участием присяжных заседателей с учетом психологических особенностей деятельности судьи, государственного обвинителя, защитника и коллегии присяжных заседателей. В работе делаются следующие основные выводы: а) установить в нормативных правовых актах Судебного департамента основные требования к перечню имущества и технических средств, обеспечивающие комфортные условия для присяжных заседателей во время судебного процесса; б) вести системную работу с кадровым составом судей, сотрудниками аппарата суда, взаимодействующих с присяжными заседателями с учетом рекомендаций, приведенных в настоящей статье; в) обеспечить судей и работников аппарата суда методической помощью по вопросам работы с присяжными заседателями. Коммуникативные барьеры в суде с участием присяжных заседателей и организационно-правовые способы их преодоления // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
