Common origin for black holes in both high mass X-ray binaries and gravitational-wave sources

Abstract

Black-hole (BH) high-mass X-ray binary (HMXB) systems are likely to be the progenitors of BH-BH mergers detected in gravitational waves by LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA (LVK). Yet merging BHs reach higher masses ($ than BHs in HMXBs ($ and typically exhibit lower spins BH 0.25$ with a larger values tail) than what is often claimed for BHs in HMXBs BH 0.9$). This could suggest that these two classes of systems belong to different populations, but here we show that this may not necessarily be the case. The difference in masses is easily explained as the known HMXB-BHs are in galaxies with relatively high metallicity, so their progenitor stars are subject to strong mass loss from winds, leading to relatively low-mass BH at core collapse. Conversely, LVK is also able to detect BHs from low-metallicity galaxies that are known to naturally produce more massive stellar-origin BHs. However, the difference in spin is more difficult to explain. Models with efficient angular momentum transport in stellar interiors produce slowly spinning progenitors for both LVK and HMXB BHs. Known HMXBs have orbital periods that are too long for efficient tidal spin-up and are also unlikely to have undergone significant accretion spin-up. Instead, we show that the derived value of the BH spin depends strongly on how the HMXB accretion disc emission is modelled. We argue that since Cyg X-1 is never observed to be in a soft spectral state, the appropriate spectral models must take into account the Comptonisation of the disc photosphere. We show that such models are consistent with low spin values, namely: $a_ BH This was recently confirmed by other teams for both Cyg X-1 and LMC X-1 and here we show this is also the case for M33 X-7. We conclude that all known HMXB BHs can exhibit a low spin in accordance with the results of stellar evolution models. Hence, the observations presented in this work are consistent with the scenario where LVK BHs and HMXB BHs belong to the same population.