Abstract
A recently reported criterion (Hien and Trinh, 2016), is reviewed. We point out that there may exist typos and errors in the main results (Proposition 6 and Theorem 7). It is also shown that the upper delay bound reported in Example 2 could not be re-established.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
