Abstract
In a recent paper,1 Haralick published an edge detection scheme that was supported, in part, by an evaluation against the Prewitt and the Marr-Hildreth (¿2G) operators. This evaluation led to the conclusion that Haralick's method performed the best, and the ¿2G operator performed the worst. The implementation of the ¿2G operator, on which this evaluation was based, differed significantly from that used by Marr and Hildreth. Evaluation of the performance of the Marr-Hildreth implementation of the ¿2G operator on similar images shows that this edge detection method in fact performs comparably to the Prewitt and Haralick operators.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
