Abstract
The most robust finding of moral injury (MI) research thus far-that past exposure to potentially morally injurious events predicts current symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-challenges conceptions that trauma is exclusively the result of fear-evoking brushes with death or sexual assault. It also calls into question the applicability to MI of treatments for PTSD grounded in the fear model of trauma. In the current article, two divergent theoretical models that have been applied to the understanding and treatment of moral injury are compared: the stress-appraisal-coping model and the stress injury model. Attention is drawn to the differences between how these models conceptualize stress and distress, including psychological trauma, and to their potential implications for the sustainment of mental health stigma, especially in military and veteran populations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
