Commentary on Drs Patz, Black, and Goodman’s Viewpoint

Abstract

HomeRadiologyVol. 221, No. 3 PreviousNext ViewpointCommentary on Drs Patz, Black, and Goodman’s ViewpointOlli S. Miettinen, Claudia I. HenschkeOlli S. Miettinen, Claudia I. HenschkeAuthor Affiliations1From the Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and the Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (O.S.M.); and the Department of Radiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10021 (C.I.H.). Received October 12, 2000; revision requested October 24; revision received December 29; accepted January 17, 2001. Address correspondence to C.I.H. (e-mail: [email protected]).Olli S. MiettinenClaudia I. HenschkePublished Online:Dec 1 2001https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2213010617MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References 1 Patz EF, Black WC, Goodman PC. CT screening for lung cancer: not ready for routine practice. Radiology 2001; 221:587-591. Link, Google Scholar2 Miettinen OS. Screening for lung cancer: can it be cost-effective? Can Med Assoc J 2000; 162:1431-1436. Google Scholar3 Miettinen OS, Henschke CI. CT screening for lung cancer: coping with nihilistic recommendations. Radiology 2001; 221:592-596. Link, Google Scholar4 Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999; 354:99-105. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Flehinger BJ, Kimmel M, Melamed MR. The effect of surgical treatment on survival from early lung cancer: implications for screening. Chest 1992; 101:101-103. Google Scholar6 Sobue T, Suzuki T, Matsura M, et al. Survival for clinical stage I lung cancer not surgically treated: comparison between screen-detected and symptom-detected cases. Cancer 1992; 69:685-692. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Henschke CI, Naidich DP, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early Lung Cancer Action project: initial findings from annual repeat screening. Cancer 2001; 92:153-159. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 International Collaboration to Screen for Lung Cancer. Proceedings of the First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth International Conferences on Screening for Lung Cancer. Available at: ICScreen.med.cornell.edu. Accessed October 1, 2001. Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished in print: Dec 2001 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByJournal of Thoracic Imaging, Vol. 36, No. 1Orvosi Hetilap, Vol. 148, No. 34Screening for Lung Cancer: Been There and Done ThatFerris M. Hall, , 1 September 2002 | Radiology, Vol. 224, No. 3A Patient’s Viewpoint on a Current ControversyWilliam J. Casarella, 1 September 2002 | Radiology, Vol. 224, No. 3Recommended Articles RSNA Education Exhibits RSNA Case Collection Vol. 221, No. 3 Metrics Downloaded 66 times Altmetric Score PDF download