Abstract
AbstractI argue that the authors’ interpretation of X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) Ce3d spectra of their materials is untenable because it largely neglects the electronic structure of cerium ions and spin‐orbit interaction of the Ce3d subshell. I conclude that at %Ce3+ values the authors derived from their Ce3d spectra offer an inaccurate account of the cerium chemistry of their materials.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
