Abstract

The Analysis Centers (ACs) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) have reprocessed a large global network of GPS tracking data from 1994.0 until 2014.0 or later. Each AC product time series was extended uniformly till early 2015 using their weekly operational IGS contributions so that the complete combined product set covers GPS weeks 730 through 1831. Three ACs also included GLONASS data from as early as 2002 but that was insufficient to permit combined GLONASS products. The reprocessed terrestrial frame combination procedures and results have been reported already, and those were incorporated into the ITRF2014 multi-technique global frame released in 2016. This paper describes the orbit and clock submissions and their multi-AC combinations and assessments. These were released to users in early 2017 in time for the adoption of IGS14 for generating the operational IGS products. While the reprocessing goal was to enable homogeneous modeling, consistent with the current operational procedures, to be applied retrospectively to the full history of observation data in order to achieve a more suitable reference for geophysical studies, that objective has only been partially achieved. Ongoing AC analysis changes and a lack of full participation limit the consistency and precision of the finished IG2 products. Quantitative internal measures indicate that the reprocessed orbits are somewhat less precise than current operational orbits or even the later orbits from the first IGS reprocessing campaign. That is even more apparent for the clocks where a lack of robust AC participation means that it was only possible to form combined 5-min clocks but not the 30-s satellite clocks published operationally. Therefore, retrospective precise point positioning solutions by users are not recommended using the orbits and clocks. Nevertheless, the orbits do support long-term stable user solutions when used with network processing with either double differencing or explicit clock estimation. Among the main benefits of the reprocessing effort is a more consistent long product set to analyze for sources of systematic error and accuracy. Work to do that is underway but the reprocessing experience already points to a number of ways future IGS performance and reprocessing campaigns can be improved.

Highlights

  • In early 2015, the International GNSS Service (IGS; Dow et al 2009) Analysis Centers (ACs) completed a second reanalysis of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data collected for a global network of tracking stations

  • This paper focuses on results from the repro2 orbit and clock combinations, resulting in reprocessed IGS combined (IG2) orbit and clock products for Global Positioning System (GPS) only

  • Estimates of orbit precision were derived from a long-arc analysis of each weekly set of IG2 and IG1/F orbits, where seven days of combined SP3c files are fit for 15 parameters of the extended CODE orbit model (ECOM; Springer et al 1998)—a six-parameter orbit state vector and the nine terms of an empirical harmonic SRP forcing model expressed in a satellite body-fixed frame

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In early 2015, the International GNSS Service (IGS; Dow et al 2009) Analysis Centers (ACs) completed a second reanalysis of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data collected for a global network of tracking stations. This second reprocessing, or repro, updates the set of definitive IGS combination data products—station positions; satellite orbits and clocks; and Earth orientation parameters (EOPs)— using the latest analysis models and methodologies. Participating analysis groups used data for the US Global Positioning System (GPS) and the Russian GLONASS system in the case of three ACs. This paper focuses on results from the repro orbit and clock combinations, resulting in reprocessed IGS combined (IG2) orbit and clock products for GPS only. Please refer to Rebischung et al (2016) for a description of the tracking network used and the associated reprocessed station positions and EOPs

Historical context
Known remaining errors in IGS products
IGS repro2 analysis models
Repro2 AC contributions and usage
IG2 orbit and clock combinations
Translations
Clock combination statistics
Quality assessment of the IG2 orbits and clocks
Long-arc analysis
PPP analysis
Summary
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.