Abstract
Simple SummaryImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have failed to overcome the high therapy resistance of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma (MUM) in contrast to the dramatic benefits of immunotherapy seen in many other tumor entities. Considering the poor clinical outcome and survival rates of MUM, the urgent need of new therapeutic approaches becomes apparent. This retrospective single-center cohort study of patients with liver-metastatic UM aims to investigate whether the combination of ICI and liver-directed therapies may improve the activity of immunotherapy against this highly malignant cancer. Our results demonstrate a response to MUM resistance to immunotherapy by combining liver-directed therapies and ICI, leading to improvement of overall survival (OS).Uveal Melanoma (UM) is a rare disease; however, it is the most common primary intraocular malignant tumor in adults. Hematogenous metastasis, occurring in up to 50% of cases, mainly to the liver (90%), is associated with poor clinical course and treatment failure. In contrast to dramatic benefits of immunotherapy in many tumor entities, as seen in cutaneous melanoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) do not achieve comparable results in Metastatic UM (MUM). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the combination of ICI with liver-directed therapies provides a potential survival benefit for those affected. This retrospective, single-center study, including n = 45 patients with MUM, compared the effect of combining ICI with liver-directed therapy (“Cohort 1”) with respect to standard therapies (“Cohort 2”) on overall survival (OS). Our results revealed a significant survival difference between Cohort 1 (median OS 22.5 months) and Cohort 2 (median OS 11.4 months), indicating that this combination may enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy and thus provide a survival benefit. There is an urgent need for randomized, prospective trials addressing the combination of liver-directed therapies and various strategies of immunotherapy (such as ICI; IMCgp100; personalized vaccines) in order to establish regimens which finally improve the prognosis of patients with MUM.
Highlights
IntroductionAs Uveal Melanoma (UM) accounts for approximately five percent of all malignant melanomas, it is considered a rare disease
Despite their common melanocytic origin, Uveal Melanoma (UM) differs significantly from cutaneous melanoma in terms of epidemiology, biology, clinical presentation, and metastasis, and regarding treatment options, including their different response to immunotherapy [1,2].As UM accounts for approximately five percent of all malignant melanomas, it is considered a rare disease
Data were retrospectively collected from 52 patients with liver-metastatic UM
Summary
As UM accounts for approximately five percent of all malignant melanomas, it is considered a rare disease. It is the most common primary intraocular tumor in adults [3,4,5]. As the Uvea is the vascular layer of the eye, hematogenous metastasis occurs in up to 50% [3,4,10] and at an early stage [9], predominantly to the liver (89%) [10]. The metastatic stage is associated with poor prognosis [11]: 1-year survival ranges from 10–15% [12] to, regarding a recent meta-analysis, 43% [13], while median overall survival (OS) ranges from 4 to 15 months [4,11]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
