Abstract

This paper discusses European and American Indian responses to intercultural murders in colonial America in the seventeenth century. The main differences between the legal traditions of European settlers and American natives are identified. The main thing among them was the lack of institutionalized structures among Indian tribes and the existence of collective responsibility for the crime when the whole clan of the offender was punished. In this historical period many Indian tribes tried to replace the principle of blood feud by the cost of various commodities, arbitrage on the part of the sachems, condolence ceremonies etc. The main problem of responses to intercultural murders was the unwillingness of the parties to agree on one common jurisdiction. In this regard, any murder involving any Indian or European had an opportunity to turn into a mass conflict or even a war. The first case was the murder of the English captain John Stone, gave rise to the beginning of the Pequot War. The second case was the murder of the Indian Christian John Sassamon. In this case the colonists first declared that they had the right to judge and condemn the Indians in accordance with the English standards of justice. All this led directly to the conflict known as the King Philips War. These intercultural murders were one of the ways to expand the territories of the European colonies and strengthening of the settlers power in the region.

Highlights

  • The main thing among them was the lack of institutionalized structures among Indian tribes

  • In this historical period many Indian tribes tried to replace the principle of blood feud by the cost

  • The main problem of responses to intercultural murders was the unwillingness of the parties to agree on

Read more

Summary

Introduction

В связи с этим любое убийство с участием как индейца, так и европейца имело возможность превратиться в массовый конфликт или даже войну. Ключевые слова: межкультурные убийства; колониальная Америка; индейцы Северной Америки; правовые обычаи индейцев; индейская политика колоний в Северной Америке; Пекотская война; война короля Филиппа; пекоты; вампаноаги; ирокезы; Джон Стоун; Джон Сассамон; кровная месть; возместительная плата; церемония соболезнования. Бытный закон нации чероки» впервые в американской историографии выдвинул тезис о том, что правовые обычаи индейцев должны оцениваться не с точки зрения европейцев, а с позиций коренных американцев, так как именно они и были непосредственными субъектами данных правовых отношений [9, p.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.