Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper focuses on the first collective titles of 1996 and 1997. It interrogates Collective Land Titling (CLT) processes and examines the differences between the actors that participated in them. It argues that communities’ narratives around their achievement did not conform to those of the other actors involved in granting the collective titles received in 1996 and 1997 or with the characterization of CLT processes as successful land reform. CLT functioned as a policy to recognize black communities’ historical presence in the Pacific region and their informal land ownership regimes in lands historically marginalized by the Colombian state.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
