Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is twofold: to provide a clear picture on the cognitive biases affecting managers’ decision-making process of implementing a performance management system (PMS), and to identify managerial practices, measures and the key challenges to manage the cognitive biases in the corporate strategy.Design/methodology/approachSemi-structured interviews, based on theoretical milestones of performance management and cognitive psychology, gathered from 104 experienced professionals’ evaluations on the likelihood and impact of managers’ cognitive biases in PMS implementation, potential solutions as well as drivers and connected criticalities.FindingsRecurring cognitive biases, together with considerable impacts, emerged in the first, and most strategic, phases of the PMS implementation. The authors developed a roadmap to support corporate transition to integrate behavioral strategy into the PMS implementation aiming to achieve economically and efficiently sound performance.Research limitations/implicationsFrom the view of proper behavioral strategy affirmation in performance management literature, in a small way, the authors contribute to a desirable taxonomy of cognitive biases so differentiated decision-making scenarios may be built to compare results and draw new observations. Behavioral studies could transversally connect the cognitive biases of performance management to actors’ sociodemographic features and personality types. Practitioners may check biases affecting their organizations by means of the questionnaire and, consequently, adopt the framework illustrated to reduce them.Originality/valuePerformance management literature has constantly investigated positive and negative behavioral factors related to the PMS. This study, instead, makes a theoretical and methodological contribution to the PMS implementation as a decision-making process. The authors propose a theoretical framework that integrates cognitive psychology insights and applies measures to reduce biases.

Highlights

  • The transition from “performance measurement” to “performance management” (Kaplan and Norton, 1992; Lebas, 1995; Amaratunga and Baldry, 2002) aimed to overcome simple appraisal for a holistic approach that is strategically conscious and accountable to set and achieve objectives

  • Professionals may refer to the questionnaire we developed to check potential cognitive biases influencing their own performance management system (PMS) implementation process

  • It is revealed that most frequent kind of participant was a male (64%), who worked in the field of financial services (47%) and occupied senior positions (65%) as he has 6–10 years’ experience on a PMS (57%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The transition from “performance measurement” to “performance management” (Kaplan and Norton, 1992; Lebas, 1995; Amaratunga and Baldry, 2002) aimed to overcome simple appraisal for a holistic approach that is strategically conscious and accountable to set and achieve objectives. The change requires integration of the strategic view, at the organizational level, and includes a variety of perspectives such as vision, mission and organizational change (Aguinis et al, 2011, 2013). An inclusive performance management system (PMS) had to consider new key elements and its implementation became harder. Sharing a vision, setting the mission as well as preparing a change require a series of decisions where alternatives should be weighted, selected and justified with members of the organization (Gruman and Saks, 2011). Performance management implementations substantially increased their successful rate (De Waal and Counet, 2009) while the use of the PMS acquired growing, internally and externally oriented, strategic relevance. Even risk-free decision-making models are based on strategic and operational metrics of performance management (Yildiz and Ahi, 2020)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.