Abstract

Ferromagnetic insulators (FI) can induce a strong exchange field in an adjacent superconductor (S) via the magnetic proximity effect. This manifests as spin splitting of the BCS density of states of the superconductor, an important ingredient for numerous superconducting spintronics applications and the realization of Majorana fermions. A crucial parameter that determines the magnitude of the induced spin splitting in FI/S bilayers is the thickness of the S layer d: In very thin samples, the superconductivity is suppressed by the strong magnetism. By contrast, in very thick samples, the spin splitting is absent at distances away from the interface. In this work, we calculate the density of states and critical exchange field of FI/S bilayers of arbitrary thickness. From here, we determine the range of parameters of interest for applications, where the exchange field and superconductivity coexist. We show that for d>3.0ξs, the paramagnetic phase transition is always of the second order, in contrast to the first-order transition in thinner samples at low temperatures. Here ξs is the superconducting coherence length. Finally, we compare our theory with the tunneling spectroscopy measurements in several EuS/Al/AlOx/Al samples. If the Al film in contact with the EuS is thinner than a certain critical value, we do not observe superconductivity, whereas, in thicker samples, we find evidence of a first-order phase transition induced by an external field. The complete transition is preceded by a regime in which normal and superconducting regions coexist. We attribute this mixed phase to inhomogeneities of the Al film thickness and the presence of superparamagnetic grains at the EuS/Al interface with different switching fields. The steplike evolution of the tunnel-barrier magnetoresistance supports this assumption. Our results demonstrate on the one hand, the important role of the S layer thickness, which is particularly relevant for the fabrication of high-quality samples suitable for applications. On the other hand, the agreement between theory and experiment demonstrates the accuracy of our theory, which, originally developed for homogeneous situations, is generalized to highly inhomogeneous systems.Received 6 January 2021Revised 16 March 2021Accepted 28 April 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023131Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.Published by the American Physical SocietyPhysics Subject Headings (PhySH)Research AreasProximity effectSpintronicsSuperconductivityCondensed Matter, Materials & Applied PhysicsInterdisciplinary Physics

Highlights

  • We have presented an exhaustive study of the role of the superconductor thickness on the spectral properties and the critical exchange field of a Ferromagnetic insulators (FI)/S bilayer

  • We found that the exchange field produces a well-defined spin splitting for thin and intermediate sized superconductors

  • The spin splitting at the FI/S interface is well approximated by the effective exchange field (7) even for thick samples

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

It was shown a long time ago [1], and confirmed in several later experiments [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], that a thin superconducting film (S), adjacent to a ferromagnetic insulator (FI), may exhibit. FI/S systems with a S layer thinner than the superconducting coherence length behave as homogeneous superconductors in a Zeeman field In this case, the wellestablished theory of a paramagnetic phase transition to the normal state applies [29,30]. The new theory has to connect the thin layer limit, in which the phase transition takes place, and the thick S layer limit, in which one expects no transition to the normal state for any value of the interfacial exchange field In this latter case, the splitting is negligible at the boundary opposite to the FI/S interface, and such a system is less suitable for applications requiring spin splittings.

MODEL AND FORMALISM
D ihaσ3τ3
EXPERIMENTS AND DISCUSSION
Findings
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.