Abstract

This paper explores the impact of institutional pressures on the adoption of environmental management accounting (EMA). EMA has been recognized as a valuable mechanism to deal with environmental issues. This paper uses institutional theory to explain the drivers of EMA adoption in Pakistan. Data were collected from the manufacturing sector in Pakistan through a questionnaire-based survey. The study concludes that coercive, normative and mimetic pressures have a significant and positive impact on the adoption of EMA.

Highlights

  • The world today is facing the adverse impacts of climate change and environmental degradation

  • In order to address these gaps, this paper aims to explore the drivers of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) adoption in Pakistan using institutional theory

  • These pressures ensure that customers and suppliers operating in the external environment and organizations operate in a social compliant manner, encouraging the adoption of EMA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The world today is facing the adverse impacts of climate change and environmental degradation. The conventional and traditional accounting systems have failed to uphold and provide environmental information in their financial accounting [2] This means that environmental information is missing from various decision making techniques and models, necessitating a new field of environmental management accounting (hereafter EMA) to address these issues [3]. The implementation of EMA is low and very few organizations are using it for decision making [9] In this context, there is a need to explore the drivers of the adoption of EMA due to its significance. In order to address these gaps, this paper aims to explore the drivers of EMA adoption in Pakistan using institutional theory. This paper provides evidence on the role of various institutional pressures on EMA adoption with the potential to contribute to sustainable development [15,16].

Institutional Theory on EMA Research
Stakeholder Theory on EMA Research
Institutional Pressures and EMA Adoption
Coercive Pressure and EMA Adoption
Normative Pressure and EMA Adoption
Mimetic Pressure and EMA Adoption
Research Conceptual Framework
Assessment of Model Using PLS-SEM
Measurement Model Assessment
Structural Model Assessment
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.