Abstract

The traditional scientific paper falls short of effectively communicating computational research. To help improve this situation, we propose a system by which the computational workflows underlying research articles are checked. The CODECHECK system uses open infrastructure and tools and can be integrated into review and publication processes in multiple ways. We describe these integrations along multiple dimensions (importance, who, openness, when). In collaboration with academic publishers and conferences, we demonstrate CODECHECK with 25 reproductions of diverse scientific publications. These CODECHECKs show that asking for reproducible workflows during a collaborative review can effectively improve executability. While CODECHECK has clear limitations, it may represent a building block in Open Science and publishing ecosystems for improving the reproducibility, appreciation, and, potentially, the quality of non-textual research artefacts. The CODECHECK website can be accessed here: https://codecheck.org.uk/.

Highlights

  • Many areas of scientific research use computations to simulate or analyse their data

  • Journals have been created to accept “data papers” (e.g., Scientific Data, Earth System Science Data, Geoscience Data Journal, Biodiversity Data Journal, Journal of Open Psychology Data, Open Data Journal for Agricultural Research, Journal of Open Health Data); these journals have established rigorous procedures by which data are validated according to standards in each field

  • We offer a thorough description of a process and its variations to integrate a much-needed evaluation of computational reproducibility into peer review, and we demonstrate its feasibility by means of 25 reproductions across scientific disciplines

Read more

Summary

30 Mar 2021

The Alan Turing Institute, Any reports and responses or comments on the article can be found at the end of the article.

Introduction
Limitations
Conclusions and future work
Marwick B
Barba LA
14. Nüst D
18. Bouffler B: Keynote at deRSE 2019
23. Barba LA
27. Eglen SJ
30. Eglen SJ
46. Eglen SJ
51. Eglen SJ
57. Davies I
62. Bivand RS
75. Eglen SJ
83. Chambers CD
88. Miyakawa T
94. Petrovečki M
98. Perkel JM
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.