Abstract

The iron and steel industry is the largest energy-consuming sector in the world. It is responsible for emitting 4–5% of the total anthropogenic CO2. As an energy-intensive industry, it is essential that the iron and steel sector accomplishes important carbon emission reduction. Carbon capture is one of the most promising alternatives to achieve this aim. Moreover, if carbon utilization via power-to-gas is integrated with carbon capture, there could be a significant increase in the interest of this alternative in the iron and steel sector. This paper presents several simulations to integrate oxy-fuel processes and power-to-gas in a steel plant, and compares gas productions (coke oven gas, blast furnace gas, and blast oxygen furnace gas), energy requirements, and carbon reduction with a base case in order to obtain the technical feasibility of the proposals. Two different power-to-gas technology implementations were selected, together with the oxy blast furnace and the top gas recycling technologies. These integrations are based on three strategies: (i) converting the blast furnace (BF) process into an oxy-fuel process, (ii) recirculating blast furnace gas (BFG) back to the BF itself, and (iii) using a methanation process to generate CH4 and also introduce it to the BF. Applying these improvements to the steel industry, we achieved reductions in CO2 emissions of up to 8%, and reductions in coal fuel consumption of 12.8%. On the basis of the results, we are able to conclude that the energy required to achieve the above emission savings could be as low as 4.9 MJ/kg CO2 for the second implementation. These values highlight the importance of carrying out future research in the implementation of carbon capture and power-to-gas in the industrial sector.

Highlights

  • The iron and steel sector is one of the most energy- and carbon-intensive in the world.Iron and steel making processes are still mostly coal-based and highly dependent on fossil fuels, releasing a substantial amount of CO2 [1]

  • According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the steel industry accounts for 4–5% of the total world CO2 emission

  • The internal energy use increased in Cases 1 and 2 due to the blocks that were added to the diagram (e.g., CH4 heating)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The iron and steel sector is one of the most energy- and carbon-intensive in the world.Iron and steel making processes are still mostly coal-based and highly dependent on fossil fuels, releasing a substantial amount of CO2 [1]. The iron and steel sector is one of the most energy- and carbon-intensive in the world. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the steel industry accounts for 4–5% of the total world CO2 emission. It is the second largest consumer of industrial energy, consuming around 616 Mtoe (25.8 EJ) [2]. The BF-BOF route uses mainly iron ore, and depending on the facility, up to 30% scrap. The EAF route mainly uses scrap, and depending on the facility, up to 30% iron and iron ore [2,3,4]

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.