Abstract
Clustering techniques are widely recommended tools for workload classification. The k-means algorithm is widely accepted as the "standard" technique of detecting workload classes automatically from measurement data. This paper examines validity of the obtained workload classes, when the current system and workload is analyzed by a queueing network model and mean value analysis. Our results, based on one week's accounting data of a VAX 8600, indicate that the results of queueing network analysis are not stable when the classes of workload are constructed through the k-means algorithm. Therefore, we cannot recommended that the most widely used clustering technique should be used in any workload characterization study without careful validation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
