Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical effect and operation difficulty of the combined skin flap with reversed proper palmar digital arterial dorsal branch island flap and cross-finger flap and the abdominal flap in the treatment of distal finger degloving injury. Methods Inclusion criteria: ①Soft tissue defect far beyond the level of distal interphalangeal joints. ②The inured finger was from second to fifth. ③Single finger injury. ④ Iniury time within 8 h. Exclusive criteria: ①With tendon injury.② Multiple finger injuries. ③Followed-up time within 6 months. Between February, 2009 and September, 2016, 52 patients (52 fingers) with distal finger degloving injury were reviewed, there were 32 males and 20 females, aged from 18 to 60(36.02±11.00) years. The time from injury to operation was 2.5-8.0 (4.81±1.28) h. Affected fingers included index finger in 15 cases, middle finger in 22 cases, ring finger in 10 cases, and little finger in 5 cases. Twenty patients (20 fingers) were treated by combined skin flap with reversed digital arterial dorsal branch island flap and cross-finger flap(group combined-flap). The cubital skin was grafted onto the donor sites. Thirty-two patients (32 fingers) were treated by abdominal flap (group abdominal-flap). Results The patients were followed-up 6-25 (9.25±3.97) months. The operation time: group combined-flap was 80-130(98.46±8.34) min and group abdominal-flap was 85-125(107.84±8.63)min. There was no significant difference in two groups(P>0.05). Pedicle division time: group combined-flap was 15-24 (16.75±1.74) d and group abdominal-flap was 24-45(28.31±5.12) d. There was a significant difference in two groups(P<0.05). And the pedicle division time in group combined-flap was much shorter than in group abdominal-flap. Flap function at last follow-up, the excellent and good rate of the flap in group combined-flap and group abdominal-flap was 90.00% and 59.38%, respectively. There was a significant difference in two groups (P<0.05), and the flap function in group combined-flap was much better than in group abdominal-flap. Affected finger function at last follow-up, the excellent and good rate of the affected fingers was 95.00% and 71.88%. There was a significant difference in two groups(P<0.05), and the affected finger function in group combined-flap was much better than in group abdominal-flap. Conclusion The combined skin flap with reversed digital arterial dorsal branch island flap and cross-finger flap is a simple and high-survival-rate flap, whose texture, appearance and clinical outcome for repair of distal finger degloving injury are much better than traditional abdominal flap. Key words: Degloved injury; Finger; Dorsal branch, proper palmar digital artery; Island flap; Cross finger skin flap; Combined skin flap; Repair

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.