Abstract

R esin-bonded fixed partial dentures offer the following significant advantages to the dentist and the patient in properly selected clinical situations: (1) tooth preparation is reduced to a minimum, (2) the procedure is reversible, (3) soft tissue management is simplified, (4) there is less problem with color matching, (5) temporary crowns are not needed, and (6) reduced cost and simplicity give high patient acceptability. There are two disadvantages: (1) bonding procedures are more difficult and time consuming than conventional luting techniques, and (2) occlusal adjustment at the try-in of the restoration is more difficult because of the lack of a retentive crown-tooth relationship. All factors considered, it seems that the use of the cast metal resin-bonded fixed partial denture should be encouraged where sound abutment teeth exist and only one or two teeth are missing. However, a question remains. Should the fixed partial dentures be considered as long-term restorations or as intermediate restorations to serve only until conditions for a conventional fixed partial denture are more ideal? The answer to this question requires laboratory testing and more clinical evaluation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.