Abstract

To evaluate whether there is a genetic contribution to the development of narrow bony cochlear nerve canal and analyze the differences between unilateral and bilateral narrow bony cochlear nerve canal. Retrospective review. Patients diagnosed with unilateral (n=44) or bilateral (n=13) sensorineural hearing loss with narrow bony cochlear nerve canals from October 2004 to July 2011 were evaluated. The segregation ratio of hearing loss among siblings of probands was calculated. The differences in segregation ratio and other clinical characteristics were also compared. The segregation ratio of hearing loss in siblings of patients with unilateral narrow bony cochlear nerve canal was close to zero, whereas the ratio in siblings of patients with bilateral canals was 20%. Internal auditory canal narrowing was significantly more frequently combined in unilateral than bilateral narrow bony cochlear nerve canal cases. Cochlear nerve deficiency based on magnetic resonance imaging was found in 63.6% of bilateral narrow bony cochlear nerve canal cases. Milder hearing loss was exclusively detected in bilateral cases. Narrow bony cochlear nerve canal is not likely to have a simple Mendelian inheritance pattern, especially in unilateral cases. The contribution of a Mendelian genetic etiology to bilateral narrow bony cochlear nerve canals remains elusive. More frequent coexistence of internal auditory canal narrowing among unilateral narrow bony cochlear nerve canal cases suggests that bilateral narrow bony cochlear nerve canals are not just a duplicate of the unilateral narrow bony cochlear nerve canal.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.