Clinical Application of Aripiprazole Monohydrate Long-Acting Injectables for the Treatment of Schizophrenia: A Consensus Panel Report.

How Would You Like to Take Your Medicine 2 Times a Year? Paliperidone Palmitate Every 6 Months for the Maintenance Treatment of Schizophrenia

Prescription patterns in patients with schizophrenia who discontinued long-acting injectable antipsychotics: A chart-review.

Bipolar I disorder (BP-I) is a severe and chronic psychiatric condition characterized by recurrent episodes of mania and depression that significantly impact quality of life and functioning. Early recurrence, high relapse rates, and poor adherence to daily oral medications complicate long-term management and increase the risk of hospitalization and suicide. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) offer a potential solution to these challenges by promoting sustained medication delivery and efficacy, reducing pharmacokinetic variability, and improving treatment adherence. Among available LAIs, aripiprazole is the only partial dopamine D₂ receptor agonist, which may contribute to its favorable tolerability and mood-stabilizing properties. Despite the robust evidence for the efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole monohydrate LAIs in patients with BP-I, this agent remains underutilized in this population. Misperceptions about efficacy and tolerability, coupled with systemic and prescriber-level barriers, have limited broader clinical adoption. To address these issues, a round table panel of experts in psychopharmacology, the clinical treatment of bipolar disorder, and antipsychotic prescribing was convened to evaluate the clinical rationale for earlier use of aripiprazole monohydrate LAIs in BP-I and to identify key challenges limiting its use. This article summarizes their consensus on the pharmacological distinctiveness, practical advantages, and potential of aripiprazole monohydrate LAIs in improving long-term outcomes in individuals with BP-I.

The use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to guide treatment with long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics, which are increasingly prescribed, remains a matter of debate. The aim of this review was to provide a practical framework for the integration of TDM when switching from an oral formulation to the LAI counterpart, and in maintenance treatment. The authors critically reviewed 3 types of data: (1) positron emission tomography data evaluating dopamine (D2/D3) receptor occupancy related to antipsychotic concentrations in serum or plasma; D2/D3 receptors are embraced as target sites in the brain for antipsychotic efficacy and tolerability, (2) pharmacokinetic studies evaluating the switch from oral to LAI antipsychotics, and (3) pharmacokinetic data for LAI formulations. Based on these data, indications for TDM and therapeutic reference ranges were considered for LAI antipsychotics. Antipsychotic concentrations in blood exhibited interindividual variability not only under oral but also under LAI formulations because these concentrations are affected by demographic characteristics such as age and sex, genetic peculiarities, and clinical variables, including comedications and comorbidities. Reported data combined with positron emission tomography evidence indicated a trend toward lower concentrations under LAI administration than under oral medications. However, the available evidence is insufficient to recommend LAI-specific therapeutic reference ranges. Although TDM evidence for newer LAI formulations is limited, this review suggests the use of TDM when switching an antipsychotic from oral to its LAI formulation. The application of TDM practice is more accurate for dose selection than the use of dose equivalents as it accounts more precisely for individual characteristics.

Disease relapse, all-cause mortality, and adverse events associated with long-acting injectable antipsychotics versus oral antipsychotics in older people with schizophrenia in Hong Kong: a population-based within-subject analysis.

BackgroundFrench clinical recommendations suggest prescribing long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics to patients with a maintenance treatment indication in schizophrenia. Despite this, and due to their relatively high acquisition and administration costs, LAIs are still underused in clinical practice in France, thus highlighting the need for pharmacoeconomic evaluations.ObjectiveOur objective was to estimate the cost effectiveness of paliperidoneLAI (or paliperidone palmitate), a once-monthly second-generation LAI antipsychotic, compared with the most common antipsychotic medications for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia in France.MethodsA Markov model was developed to simulate the progression of a cohort of schizophrenic patients through four health states (stable treated, stable non-treated, relapse and death) and to consider up to three lines of treatment to account for changes in treatment management. Paliperidone LAI was compared with risperidone LAI, aripiprazole LAI, olanzapine LAI, haloperidol LAI (or haloperidol decanoate) and oral olanzapine. Costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and number of relapses were assessed over 5 years based on 3-month cycles with a discount rate of 4 % and from a French health insurance perspective. Patients were considered to be stabilised after a schizophrenic episode and would enter the model at an initiation phase, followed by a prevention of relapse phase if successful. Data (e.g. relapse or discontinuation rates) for the initiation phase came from randomised clinical trials, whereas relapse rates in the prevention phase were derived from hospitalisation risks based on real-life French data to capture adherence effects. Safety and utility data were derived from international publications. Additionally, costs were retrieved from French health insurance databases and publications. Finally, expert opinion was used for validation purposes or in case of gaps in data. The robustness of results was assessed through deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.ResultsAll LAI antipsychotics were found to have similar costs over 5 years: approximatively €55,000, except for paliperidone LAI which had a discounted cost of €50,880. Oral olanzapine was less costly than LAIs (i.e. €50,379 after 5 years) but was associated with fewer QALYs gained and relapses avoided. Paliperidone LAI dominated aripiprazole LAI, olanzapine LAI and haloperidol LAI in terms of costs per QALY, and it was associated with slightly fewer QALYs when compared with risperidone LAI (i.e. 3.763 vs 3.764). This resulted in a high incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (i.e. €4,770,018 per QALY gained) for risperidone LAI compared with paliperidone LAI. Paliperidone LAI was more costly than olanzapine oral but associated with more QALYs (i.e. ICER of €2411 per QALY gained for paliperidone LAI compared with oral olanzapine). Paliperidone LAI had a probability of being the optimal strategy in more than 50 % of cases for a willingness-to-pay threshold of €8000 per QALY gained.ConclusionThis analysis, to the best of our knowledge, is the first of its kind to assess the cost effectiveness of antipsychotics based on French observational data. Paliperidone LAI appeared to be a cost-effective option in the treatment of schizophrenia from the French health insurance perspective.

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are a useful but underutilized option in the management of schizophrenia.Areas covered: This is a narrative review of newer LAI antipsychotics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and is an update to a previously published review from 2013. Emphasized are new indications and new dosing intervals.Expert commentary: Ensuring that persons receiving oral antipsychotics are aware that LAI antipsychotics are available is important. The use of LAI antipsychotics can decrease the risk of relapse in both first-episode and chronic schizophrenia. Available treatments differ in terms of specific indications, approved injection sites, needle gauge, injection volume, injection interval, requirements for oral supplementation, availability of pre-filled syringes, storage needs, and post-injection observation period, as well as potential drug-drug interactions and commonly encountered adverse reactions. Approved indications have expanded beyond schizophrenia to also include bipolar maintenance (risperidone microspheres and aripiprazole monohydrate) and schizoaffective disorder (paliperidone palmitate monthly). Intervals between injections can be longer than one month (six-week or two-month aripiprazole lauroxil, and three-month paliperidone palmitate). After a review of the evidence-base, guidance is offered on the appropriate selection among the LAI formulations of both first and second-generation antipsychotics.

Objective Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are recommended in the treatment non-adherence. Despite the widespread use of LAI antipsychotics, there is limited data on clinical outcomes in bipolar I disorder (BD-I) patients with real-world data. We aimed to compare BD-I patients treated with LAI and oral antipsychotics (OAP) in terms of treatment effectiveness in a 1-year follow-up period. Methods The study was conducted retrospectively with electronic health records of 116 BDI patients. The primary outcomes were whether patients in the LAI group and the OAP group differed in relapse, rehospitalization, emergency room (ER) visits, and all-cause treatment discontinuation at 1-year follow-up after a mania episode. Cox regression modeling was used to predict the recurrence of any mood episode and all-cause treatment discontinuation during follow-up. The secondary outcomes evaluated were the effects of sociodemographic and clinical parameters and concomitant psychotropic medications on the course of the illness and treatment adherence. Results Of all 116 patients, 33 (28.4%) were under LAI, and 83 (71.6%) were under OAP treatment. LAI users had a history of more hospitalizations and total mood episodes. Patients in the LAI group had more treatment non-adherence before the index hospitalization. At 1-year follow-up, there was no difference between the groups in terms of any mood relapse, rehospitalization, ER visits, and all-cause treatment discontinuation. As a secondary outcome, lithium users were found to have fewer new episodes and discontinuations of treatments. Conclusions In real-world data, there is no evidence that LAI antipsychotics (compared to OAP) are superior in the maintenance treatment of BD. These results are important in terms of reflecting clinical practices for the treatment of BD-I. These results do not devalue the use of LAI therapy in BD; however, more studies are needed to identify positive predictors for LAI treatments in BD.

The availability of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia provides clinicians with options that deliver continuous drug exposure and may improve adherence compared with daily oral antipsychotics. However, all LAI antipsychotics have unique formulations and pharmacokinetic characteristics that have implications for medication selection, administration interval, and injection site. This review outlines key differences in drug formulations and pharmacokinetics among LAI antipsychotics. A systematic search of the PubMed database was conducted to identify physical and formulation properties and pharmacokinetic data of commercially available LAI antipsychotics, including flupentixol decanoate, fluphenazine decanoate, haloperidol decanoate, zuclopenthixol decanoate, aripiprazole monohydrate, aripiprazole lauroxil, olanzapine pamoate, paliperidone palmitate, risperidone microspheres, and risperidone polymeric microspheres. Additional information was obtained from package inserts and product monographs. Relevant data on drug properties, administration details, pharmacokinetic parameters, and oral dose equivalencies of LAI antipsychotics are summarized. Based on our analysis, formulation characteristics (e.g., vehicle medium) and administration characteristics (e.g., injection site) can affect rate of absorption and adverse effects and may factor into whether oral supplementation or an additional injection is needed. Dose adjustments may be necessary based on potential drug–drug interactions, and approximate dose equivalence with oral formulations can help inform titration when switching from oral to LAI formulations. Clinicians administering LAI antipsychotics should consider these formulation and pharmacokinetic factors to maximize clinical impact and to adjust to an individual patient’s needs and treatment goals.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40263-020-00779-5.

Recommandations Formalisées d’Experts de l’AFPBN : prescription des neuroleptiques et antipsychotiques d’action prolongée

ObjectiveSchizophrenia is a severe and chronic mental disorder that significantly impacts cognitive, social, and occupational functions, leading to substantial economic burdens. Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics have been introduced to improve treatment adherence and outcomes, yet their economic impact remains debated. We aim to analyze the impact of LAIs on the medical costs of Korean schizophrenia patients.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 164 schizophrenia patients treated with LAI antipsychotics, paliperidone palmitate, and aripiprazole monohydrate at Korea University Guro Hospital between January 2017 and July 2022 was performed. Comparisons of inpatient department (IPD) and outpatient department (OPD) healthcare expenditures one year before and after LAI initiation were conducted.ResultsLAIs led to an increase in annual OPD costs (1,437.44 ± 1,127.60 to 4,015.42 ± 1,204.59; units 1,000 KRW) but significantly reduced IPD admission associated costs (3,826.06 ± 5,500.63 to 698.06 ± 3,619.38; units 1,000 KRW). After LAI administration, there was an overall reduction in total annual healthcare costs (5,263.49 ± 5,333.11 to 4,713.48 ± 3,625.89; units 1,000 KRW), but it was not statistically significant.ConclusionAlthough the use of LAIs did not significantly lower the first-year medical costs of schizophrenia patients, they offer beneficial economic impacts over time by reducing hospitalization-associated costs. Future research should focus on long-term cost analyses and the impacts of newer LAI formulations.

Patients with schizophrenia receiving antipsychotic treatment present lower mortality rates than those who do not. However, the non-adherence rate is high, which can be partially addressed using long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics. The impact of LAI treatments on all-cause mortality compared to oral antipsychotics remains unclear. To fill that gap, a random effects meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the odds ratio (OR) of all-cause, suicidal, and non-suicidal mortality among patients taking LAI antipsychotics compared to oral antipsychotics (PROSPERO:CRD42023391352). Individual and pooled LAI antipsychotics were analyzed against pooled oral antipsychotics. Sensitivity analyses were performed for study design, setting, and industry sponsorship. Meta-regressions were conducted for gender, age, antipsychotic dose, and race. Seventeen articles, total sample 12,042 patients (N = 5795 oral, N = 6247 LAI) were included. Lower risk of all-cause mortality for patients receiving LAI antipsychotics vs receiving oral antipsychotics was found (OR = 0.79; 95%CI = 0.66–0.95). Statistical significance was maintained when only studies comparing the same LAI and oral antipsychotic were included (OR = 0.79; 95%CI = 0.66–0.95; p = <0.01), as well as for non-suicidal mortality (OR = 0.77: 95%CI = 0.63–0.94; p = 0.01), but not for suicidal mortality (OR = 0.86; 95%CI = 0.59–1.26; p = 0.44). Mortality reduction was more pronounced for LAI antipsychotics in first-episode psychosis (FEP) (OR = 0.79; 95%CI = 0.66–0.96) compared to chronic psychosis. No individual LAI reported statistically significant differences against all pooled oral antipsychotics. LAI antipsychotics are associated with a lower risk of all-cause and non-suicidal mortality in individuals with schizophrenia compared to oral antipsychotics. Better adherence to the medication and health services may explain this difference. Whenever possible, the use of LAIs should be considered from the FEP.

Background and importanceTreatment with long acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics has been shown to improve treatment adherence compared with oral antipsychotics, but it is still controversial if adherence is modified with...

Five long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are currently available in the United States for the treatment of schizophrenia: fluphenazine decanoate, haloperidol decanoate, risperidone microspheres, paliperidone palmitate, and olanzapine pamoate. Additionally, aripiprazole LAI is currently under FDA review. However, research into the safety and tolerability of these LAIs, with particular regard to the development of postinjection delirium/sedation syndrome (PDSS), is limited and has been focused mainly on olanzapine pamoate. This proposal seeks to review data regarding all currently available LAI antipsychotics to determine if a significant association exists between these depot formulations and the development of PDSS. A review of all published literature from 2005 to the present was obtained via a PubMed search for current data regarding the topic of LAIs and the development of PDSS. Keywords used for the search were "long-acting injectable antipsychotics" in association with one of the following: "post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome," "PDSS, " "side effects, " and "tolerability." References to key articles were further explored for relevancy to this proposal. A case analysis based on all 8 olanzapine LAI clinical trials conducted between August 2000 and October 2008 showed an occurrence of PDSS in approximately 0.07% of injections or 1.4% of patients (30 cases in 29 patients). A second case analysis reviewing the clinical trial databases for 15 completed studies and the postmarketing safety database for risperidone LAI versus 10 completed clinical trials of paliperidone palmitate failed to demonstrate an occurrence of PDSS events in patients receiving either LAI treatment. However, one case of PDSS was identified in a placebo group. In 4 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, treatment-emergent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were similar for paliperidone palmitate and placebo; however, among the most frequently occurring treatment-emergent adverse events was somnolence/sedation (5%-7% paliperidone palmitate group vs 3% placebo). Postinjection delirium/sedation syndrome is a potentially serious adverse event that has been shown to be associated with one currently available LAI antipsychotic, olanzapine pamoate. However, further data are still needed to both support this conclusion and determine if an association exists among other currently available LAIs and PDSS. With the bulk of current evidence coming from registration studies, head-to-head comparison studies between 2 LAIs would help to determine whether the risk of postinjection complications differs among different agents. Further observational studies are also needed to address the incidence, severity, and optimal clinical management of this syndrome.

Current guidelines for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia advocate that patients receive treatment with a long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medication if they prefer such treatment or if they have a history of poor or uncertain adherence. Available LAI formulations in the United States include first-generation antipsychotics (fluphenazine decanoate and haloperidol decanoate), risperidone/paliperidone containing products (risperidone microspheres, paliperidone palmitate, and risperidone subcutaneous), aripiprazole containing products (aripiprazole monohydrate and aripiprazole lauroxil), and olanzapine pamoate. LAI antipsychotics can address the guesswork about adherence status and patients may prefer them if they are offered this as a choice, including individuals early in their disease course. Additional approved indications in the United States for LAI antipsychotics include bipolar I disorder maintenance treatment for risperidone microspheres and aripiprazole monohydrate, and schizoaffective disorder for paliperidone palmitate once monthly. Differences and similarities among the different products are discussed, including guidance regarding optimal treatment selection. Tips are provided to enhance effective patient communication to maximize the likelihood of acceptance of this treatment modality.