Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has recently enabled to identify four distinct Alzheimer's disease (AD) subtypes: hippocampal sparing (HpSp), typical AD (tAD), limbic predominant (Lp), and minimal atrophy (MinAtr). To date, however, the natural history of these subtypes, especially regarding the presence of subjects switching to other MRI patterns and their clinical and biological differences, remains poorly understood. To investigate the clinical and biological underpinnings of longitudinal atrophy pattern progression in AD. 251 AD patients (16 with significant memory concern, 66 with early mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 125 with late MCI, and 44 with AD dementia) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database were assigned to their baseline MRI atrophy subtype using Freesurfer-derived cortical:hippocampal volumes ratio. Switching to other MRI patterns was investigated on longitudinal scans, and patients were accordingly classified as "switching" and "stable". Logistic regression models were applied to identify predictors of switching to other MRI patterns. 40% of Lp, 26% of HpSp, and 35% of MinAtr cases switched to other MRI patterns, with tAD representing the destination subtype of all switching HpSp and Lp, and the majority of MinAtr. At baseline significant clinical, cognitive and biomarkers differences were observed across the four subtypes. Only clinical and cognitive variables, however, were significantly associated with switch to other MRI patterns. Our results suggest convergent directions of disease progression across atypical and typical AD forms, at least in a subset of AD subjects, and highlight the importance of deep-phenotyping approaches to understand AD heterogeneity.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.