Abstract
Concerns for justice are widely considered in international climate negotiations as central to effective responses to climate change. However, there is debate as to what crucial notions of justice need to be reflected in a global climate change treaty. This study uses the Delphi method to identify the climate justice concepts that would be most appropriate for the global climate treaty from an Australian perspective. It is contended that the Delphi method, which allows future forecasting based on the consensus feedback of an expert panel, is the best technique to advance a defensible action plan to ensure climate justice.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
