Abstract
As the lengthy retrial in the Roger Clemens perjury case proceeds, attorneys for both sides have already wrestled with what may be their most critical, yet difficult, task: selection of a neutral jury. Predictably, this case has garnered a slew of media coverage already, and a host of ancillary factors has placed additional significance on this selection process. Finding a neutral panel proved to be an arduous task in this case, particularly with former and prospective jurors publically questioning whether the entire trial is a waste of time and resources, and in light of the nature of the crimes charged against a man of Clemens’ stature. This accumulation of circumstances has propagated an increased likelihood of jury nullification.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
