Abstract
The reliability of a multidimensional test instrument is commonly estimated using coefficients ωt (total) and ωh (hierarchical). However, point estimates for the coefficients are rarely accompanied by uncertainty estimates. In this study, we compare bootstrap and normal-theory confidence intervals. In addition, we develop Bayesian versions of coefficients ωt and ωh by sampling from a second-order factor model. Results from a comprehensive simulation study show that the studied confidence intervals performed well when the sample size was sufficiently large (). The Bayesian estimates performed well across most studied conditions. When the sample size was small and the reliability low, only the bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap confidence interval approached a satisfactory coverage among all intervals. This study guides on ωt and ωh confidence intervals and introduces ωt and ωh credible intervals that are easy to use and come with the benefits of Bayesian parameter estimation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.