Abstract

This paper examines the media's role in the claims-making process, specifically as this relates to the construction of legitimacy. The 1981 Northern Irish hunger strike was a claims-making activity in which paramilitary prisoners sought to construct themselves as legitimate political actors rather than “terrorists.” To challenge the assumptions of the criminalization policy that characterized paramilitary organizations as terrorists who lacked popular support, the prisoners contested parliamentary elections and ultimately starved themselves to death. A qualitative content analysis of coverage of their claims in the Irish Times , the London Times, and the New York Times shows that, while the three papers offered criticisms of the criminalization policy, they did not present the prisoners' claims as legitimate. The paper concludes that local media and cultural understandings of such events may provide sufficient support to sustain these understandings, even in the presence of negative coverage in national media.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.