Abstract
Recently, circumcentering reflection method (CRM) has been introduced for solving the feasibility problem of finding a point in the intersection of closed constraint sets. It is closely related with Douglas–Rachford method (DR). We prove local convergence of CRM in the same prototypical settings of most theoretical analysis of regular nonconvex DR, whose consideration is made natural by the geometry of the phase retrieval problem. For the purpose, we show that CRM is related to the method of subgradient projections. For many cases when DR is known to converge to a feasible point, we establish that CRM locally provides a better convergence rate. As a root finder, we show that CRM has local convergence whenever Newton–Raphson method does, has quadratic rate whenever Newton–Raphson method does, and exhibits superlinear convergence in many cases when Newton–Raphson method fails to converge at all. We also obtain explicit regions of convergence. As an interesting aside, we demonstrate local convergence of CRM to feasible points in cases when DR converges to fixed points that are not feasible. We demonstrate an extension in higher dimensions, and use it to obtain convergence rate guarantees for sphere and subspace feasibility problems. Armed with these guarantees, we experimentally discover that CRM is highly sensitive to compounding numerical error that may cause it to achieve worse rates than those guaranteed by theory. We then introduce a numerical modification that enables CRM to achieve the theoretically guaranteed rates. Any future works that study CRM for product space formulations of feasibility problems should take note of this sensitivity and account for it in numerical implementations.
Highlights
The Douglas–Rachford method (DR) is frequently used to solve feasibility problems of the form find x ∈ A ∩ B, (1)where, here and throughout, A and B are closed subsets of a finite dimensional Hilbert space H and A∩B = ∅
We prove local convergence of circumcentering reflection method (CRM) in the same prototypical settings of most theoretical analysis of regular nonconvex DR, whose consideration is made natural by the geometry of the phase retrieval problem
For many cases when DR is known to converge to a feasible point, we establish that CRM locally provides a better convergence rate
Summary
Where, here and throughout, A and B are closed subsets of a finite dimensional Hilbert space H and A∩B = ∅. For such problems the method consists of iterating the DR operator, which is an averaged composition of two over-relaxed projection operators defined as follows: TA,B := 1 2 RB RA + RC := 2PC − Id, (2). For a more comprehensive overview of its history, including the broader context of DR as a splitting method in solving optimization problems, see for example, [39]. For more on the use of DR for solving both nonconvex and convex feasibility problems, refer to [9]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.