Abstract

A selection hyper-heuristic is a high level search methodology which operates over a fixed set of low level heuristics. During the iterative search process, a heuristic is selected and applied to a candidate solution in hand, producing a new solution which is then accepted or rejected at each step. Selection hyper-heuristics have been increasingly, and successfully, applied to single-objective optimization problems, while work on multi-objective selection hyper-heuristics is limited. This work presents one of the initial studies on selection hyper-heuristics combining a choice function heuristic selection methodology with great deluge and late acceptance as non-deterministic move acceptance methods for multi-objective optimization. A well-known hypervolume metric is integrated into the move acceptance methods to enable the approaches to deal with multi-objective problems. The performance of the proposed hyper-heuristics is investigated on the Walking Fish Group test suite which is a common benchmark for multi-objective optimization. Additionally, they are applied to the vehicle crashworthiness design problem as a real-world multi-objective problem. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the non-deterministic move acceptance, particularly great deluge when used as a component of a choice function based selection hyper-heuristic.

Highlights

  • Hyper-heuristics perform a search over the space of heuristics when solving problems

  • With respect to the measure of the hypervolume (SSC), great deluge algorithm (GDA) has the best overall mean performance when compared to AM and late acceptance (LA), and this performance difference is statistically significant across all Walking Fish Group (WFG) problems, except WFG2

  • For WFG1, AM performs slightly better than GDA and significantly better than LA, while for WFG9, LA performs significantly better than AM and GDA performs slightly better than AM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hyper-heuristics perform a search over the space of heuristics when solving problems. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is one of the first studies that investigate the influence of the move acceptance component on the performance of a selection hyper-heuristic for multi-objective optimization. We have adopted the great deluge algorithm (GDA) and late acceptance (LA) separately as a non-deterministic move acceptance component of a selection hyper-heuristic for multi-objective optimization and we have tested the performance of the overall algorithm using the same set of low level heuristics as in our previous study on the well-known Walking Fish Group (WFG) benchmark instances [12]. The empirical results show that it is the best option as a multi-objective selection hyper-heuristic move acceptance component, outperforming each individual low level (meta-)heuristic run on their own for the WFG instances and NSGA II for the vehicle crashworthiness design problem.

Move Acceptance Methods
Great Deluge
2: Produce an initial solution s
Late Acceptance
3: Produce an initial solution s
Proposed Multi-objective Selection Hyper-heuristic Approach
Related Work
WFG Test Problems
Performance Evaluation Criteria
Experimental Settings
Results
Performance Evaluation Criteria and Experimental Settings
Performance Comparison of Selection Hyper-heuristics and NSGAII
Conclusion
Problem Methods

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.