Chiropractic student diagnosis and management of headache disorders: A survey examining self-perceived preparedness and clinical proficiency.

A headache is defined as “pain found in the head above the orbito-meatal line and or nuchal ridge” and widely affects both males and females globally. Chiropractic treatment and the management of headaches is substantial, with one in five new patients’ chief complaint being a headache and, thus, the use of chiropractic care in the management and treatment of headaches is popular. The term “self-perceived preparedness” refers to how people view themselves in terms of confidence and competency with regard to certain skills. Self-perceived preparedness is essential as it relates to one’s confidence and the ability to accurately diagnose and manage headache disorders. There is a definite scarcity in South African literature as to the self-perceived preparedness of students in the diagnosis and management of headache disorders. In a South African chiropractic context, the literature, with regard to students’ confidence, awareness and self-assessment of skills is lacking. There are a number of advantages that can come from exploring the concept of self-perceived preparedness. The benefits include, but are not limited to, the assessment of whether or not the curricula goals have been achieved, the readiness of chiropractic students to confidently and correctly diagnose and manage patients sufficiently, and the different aspects that can lead to one feeling unprepared. Aim The aim of this study was to explore and describe the self-perceived preparedness of the chiropractic students’ in the diagnosis and management of headache disorders. Methodology This study design employed a qualitative, explorative and descriptive design. Purposeful sampling was utilised and individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 Master’s degree students in the chiropractic programme. These interviews took place “in person” and an interview guide was utilised in each interview. The interviews were conducted over a week from the 18th to the 23rd of September 2023. The questions surrounded the topics of self-perceived preparedness, confidence, challenges (whether educational or personal) and the effect of clinical exposure on one’s confidence and skills. The interviews were analysed and themes were extracted utilising Tesch’s eight-step approach of data analysis. Results The chief themes that emerged from the data collection included the level of preparedness, educational and environmental challenges, as well as the positive role that clinical exposure had on students’ views of their self-perceived preparedness. The participants felt largely unprepared to deal clinically with headache disorders. This stemmed from the feeling of isolation within academia, lack of support from staff and clinicians, lack of practical aspects within the curriculum and the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in a lack of in-person interaction. Conclusion The findings of this study highlighted the lack of confidence and feeling of under-preparedness to deal with headache disorders within a clinic setting by chiropractic Master’s students. This was mainly attributed to educational and environmental challenges. However, the exposure students gained within a clinical environment greatly improved their feeling of overall self-perceived preparedness

There have been no prior studies assessing the status of undergraduate headache training and education in Singapore. Unmet needs of undergraduate medical students in terms of knowledge-practice gaps pertaining to diagnosis and management of headache disorders are unknown. The possible underemphasis of this aspect of the curriculum as compared to other chronic conditions such as diabetes mellitus has also not been ascertained. The aim of this article is to assess the knowledge base and perceptions, thereby identifying the unmet needs of headache disorder education in undergraduate medical students. Students reported their perceived time that was devoted to the subject matter and this was recorded and reported. In order to provide a comparative indication on the level of prioritization, the total duration within the syllabus dedicated to headache education vs other chronic diseases (using diabetes mellitus as a surrogate) was sought. A comprehensive survey consisting of questions assessing the headache curriculum, knowledge, and perceptions was developed. The questionnaire was distributed to final year medical students attending a full-day Neurology review course in their last semester. Attendees were given the duration of the course to complete the questionnaire, and forms were collected at the end of the day. About 127 final year medical students completed our survey. More than half (55.1%) did not receive formal teaching on how to take a complete headache history. The majority (90.6%) have not attended a headache sub-specialty clinic. The mean total number of hours exposed to headache disorders was 5.69h (SD ± 5.19). The vast majority (96.1%) were unfamiliar with locally published clinical practice guidelines, and a significant proportion (74.0%) were unfamiliar with the third edition (beta) of the International Classification of Headache Disorders. Nearly half (47.2%) were unfamiliar with 'medication overuse headache' as a disease entity. Only one (0.8%) respondent was able to correctly classify all listed primary and secondary headache disorders correctly. Only 37.0% were able to identify all 4 indications (headaches that were new, worsening, and unresponsive to treatment or associated with neurological symptoms) that warranted neuroimaging in a patient with a pre-existing diagnosis of migraine. The antidepressants were the most frequently reported incorrect option for the abortive treatment of migraine (16.5%). Nearly one-fifth (18.9%) were unable to name a single abortive treatment correctly, while a significant proportion (39.4%) could not identify a single correct prophylactic migraine treatment. A large proportion (62.2%) opined that their exposure to 'headache diagnosis and management' was inadequate, with a minority (3.1%) being 'very comfortable' in the diagnosing migraine. A significant proportion felt uncomfortable in treating special population groups diagnosed with migraine - pregnant (79.5%), elderly (48.0%), those with cardiac conditions (51.2%). The current medical undergraduate curriculum on headache disorders in Singapore may harbor significant unmet needs. A review of the syllabus to increase headache education may be one method to address this gap. Further studies in this area are required.

Diagnosis and management of headache disorders in osteopathic practice: A qualitative study

Background Three successive editions of the International Classification of Headache Disorders and multiple guideline papers on headache care have described evidence based diagnosis and treatment of headache disorders. It remains unknown, however, to which extent this has improved the diagnosis and management of headache. That was the aim of our study in which we also analysed differences between three social groups in Russia. Methods We studied 1042 students (719 females, 323 males, mean age 20.6, age range 17-40), 1075 workers (146 females, 929 males, mean age 40.4, age range 21-67) and 1007 blood donors (484 females, 523 males, mean age 34.1, age range 18-64). We conducted a semi-structured, validated, face-to-face professional interview. Data on prevalence and associated factors have previously been published. A section of the interview focused on previous diagnosis and treatment, the topic of this paper. Results Only 496 of 2110 participants (23%) with headache in Russia had consulted because of headache. Students consulted more frequently (35%), workers and blood donors less often (13% and 14%). Only 12% of the patients with ICHD-3beta diagnosis of migraine and 11.7% with ICHD-3beta diagnosis of tension-type headache (TTH) had previously been correctly diagnosed. Triptans were used by only 6% of migraine patients. Only 0.4% of migraine patients and no TTH patients had received prophylactic treatment. Conclusion Despite existing guidelines about diagnosis and treatment, both remain poor in Russia. According to the literature this is only slightly better in Europe and America. Dissemination of existing knowledge should have higher priority in the future.

The purpose of this study was to assess chiropractic students' opinions of their digital literacy proficiencies. A cross-sectional, quantitative, and exploratory study was conducted with 1st to 4th year bachelor of health sciences and 1st to 2nd year master of health sciences chiropractic students (n = 244) at the University of Johannesburg using an anonymous, self-administered online Likert-style questionnaire. The 41-item survey collected demographic data and students' self-perceptions on 4 aspects of digital literacy skills, namely, information literacy (IL), information communications technology literacy (ICTL), information and communications technology utilization (ICTU), and media literacy (ML). Data were analyzed according to the 4 constructs. The response rate was 57.78% (n = 141). The majority of students were 18-24 years of age and female and the highest year cohort was from 1st year master of health sciences chiropractic students. Students reported high levels of agreement within IL (M = 4.220; SD = .472), and ML (M = 4.271; SD = .507) constructs and lower levels of agreement within ICTL (M = 3.808; SD = .568) and ICTU (M = 3.762; SD = .562) constructs. Age and sex were not statistically significant; academic year was significant for IL only (p = .040). All 4 constructs exhibited acceptable internal consistency (IL: 0.862; ICTL: 0.830; ICTU: 0.840; ML: 0.844). Gaps were highlighted in the perception of ICTL and ICTU skills in all chiropractic students and trends emphasizing differences between basic and higher order levels of digital literacy skills between junior and senior years of study, respectively. There is a need to bridge the gap in skills at department, faculty, and university levels.

The diagnosis and management of headache disorders in the elderly are challenging. The evaluation of the elderly patient with new-onset or recurrent headache requires a grasp of the heterogeneous set of causes of secondary head pain disorders. Once such aetiologies are excluded, the correct primary headache disorder must be diagnosed. Although tension-type headache is the leading cause of new-onset headache in the elderly, other primary headache disorders such as migraine can manifest in later life, and one disorder, hypnic headache, occurs almost exclusively in the elderly. Primary chronic daily headache persists in elderly patients to a greater extent than the primary episodic headache disorders do. The treatment of elderly patients with primary headache disorders is multifaceted, including acute, prophylactic and at times transitional treatments. Knowledge of drug interactions is particularly important as polypharmacy is the rule. Concomitant illnesses may require adjustments in choice or dose of drugs. In addition, as many acute and preventive treatments are either contraindicated or poorly tolerated in the elderly, modifiable risk factors for headache progression and perpetuation must be addressed. In spite of these treatment complexities, there are numerous opportunities to bring relief to older patients with primary headache disorders from the currently available therapies. New treatment options for elderly patients with headache will soon be available, including acute, prophylactic and interventional techniques.

This review provides an overview of the current and future role of artificial intelligence (AI) and virtual reality (VR) in addressing the complexities inherent to the diagnosis, classification, and management of headache disorders. Through machine learning and natural language processing approaches, AI offers unprecedented opportunities to identify patterns within complex and voluminous datasets, including brain imaging data. This technology has demonstrated promise in optimizing diagnostic approaches to headache disorders and automating their classification, an attribute particularly beneficial for non-specialist providers. Furthermore, AI can enhance headache disorder management by enabling the forecasting of acute events of interest, such as migraine headaches or medication overuse, and by guiding treatment selection based on insights from predictive modeling. Additionally, AI may facilitate the streamlining of treatment efficacy monitoring and enable the automation of real-time treatment parameter adjustments. VR technology, on the other hand, offers controllable and immersive experiences, thus providing a unique avenue for the investigation of the sensory-perceptual symptomatology associated with certain headache disorders. Moreover, recent studies suggest that VR, combined with biofeedback, may serve as a viable adjunct to conventional treatment. Addressing challenges to the widespread adoption of AI and VR in headache medicine, including reimbursement policies and data privacy concerns, mandates collaborative efforts from stakeholders to enable the equitable, safe, and effective utilization of these technologies in advancing headache disorder care. This review highlights the potential of AI and VR to support precise diagnostics, automate classification, and enhance management strategies for headache disorders.

BackgroundRecent data indicate that the three-month prevalence of severe headaches or migraines in the US general population is close to 25%. Participation of primary care providers will therefore be critical in providing care to affected individuals.ObjectiveTo determine the number of headache disorder consult requests to a neurology outpatient service in a tertiary medical center, the appropriateness of the consult requests, and the effectiveness of a lecture series on headache diagnosis and management in preventing inappropriate consult requests from non-neurology providers.MethodsClinical data on US Veterans is captured and documented in the Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture (VISTA). The Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) electronic medical record (EMR) was used for data entry and retrieval. All consult requests for the study period within the VA North Texas Health Care System were identified in VISTA, and the clinical information reviewed in CPRS. Based on a defined algorithm, headache consult request were categorized as appropriate or inappropriate. A board-certified neurologist provided four in-person/virtual lectures to ambulatory care providers, primary care providers, internal medicine residents, and emergency room providers within the VA North Texas Health Care System on the diagnosis and management of headaches. Prior and post the lecture series, the total number of headache consults per day was assessed over 45-day periods.ResultsThe number of daily headache consult requests in the 45-day period prior to the lecture series was 3.6 per day (standard deviation 2.7), and 6.0 per day after the lecture series (standard deviation 2.1). The difference was not statistically significant. There were as many inappropriate headache consult requests after the lecture series as appropriate ones (50% each).ConclusionWe found that a short-term educational initiative that instructed primary care providers on the diagnosis and management of common headache disorders did not reduce the number of consultation requests and, surprisingly, it did not improve the appropriateness of the consults. Given the prevalence of headaches in the general population, better training of all primary care providers in headache management should be pursued.

Whiplash, Headache, and Neck Pain

Anatomy has been at the foundation of medical students' training. In recent decades, medical programs in many countries have undergone major reform in both pedagogy and content. These reforms generated intense debates, focusing mainly on the way the new programs affected medical graduates' knowledge of anatomy and their clinical capabilities. Anatomy, however, is not only core to medicine, but also to a number of allied and complementary health disciplines. While the evaluation of anatomy teaching and learning in the medical programs has been heavily scrutinized, anatomy education in the complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) professions, including those, such as chiropractic, in which anatomy has traditionally been one of the main preclinical subjects, has been less frequently evaluated. The study aimed to make a preliminary assessment of the final year chiropractic students' knowledge of anatomy using the "carpal bone test." The testing was conducted on the final-year chiropractic students at Macquarie University in 2009. In this test, the students were given 5 minutes to label an illustration of the bony skeleton of the carpal region. The results of this assessment were then compared to results of previously published surveys using the "carpal bone test." A total of 84 students participated in the study. Thirty-eight percent (38%) of students identified all eight bones, while 60% of students identified five or more carpal bones. The most frequent correctly identified bone was the pisiform, followed by the scaphoid bone (82% and 74% of students, respectively). The trapezium and trapezoid bones were least frequently identified: both by 52% of students each. These results were generally better than those of the previously tested final-year medical students. The importance of anatomy in chiropractors' education has been generally acknowledged. This study suggests that the comparatively high number of hours devoted to anatomy in Macquarie University chiropractic curriculum and underpinning of clinical skills to anatomy knowledge in the senior year have increased retention of anatomy knowledge. The study, preliminary in nature, has also recognized the need for more detailed assessment of teaching and learning of the basic medical sciences in chiropractic and other CAM disciplines.

A growing number of clinical trials are testing Chinese acupuncture in the management of headache disorders. Little is known, however, about the relationship between International Headache Society diagnostic criteria and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) diagnosis in primary headache disorders. We conducted a secondary analysis of the data of the prospective, controlled, blinded German acupuncture trials for migraine and tension-type headache. Data were collected from 1042 headache patients, of whom 633 were diagnosed with migraine and 409 with tension-type headache. We found that the diagnoses of migraine and tension-type headache were mirrored by different patterns of TCM diagnoses, with the patterns Liver Yang Rising, Liver Fire Rising, and Phlegm appearing to be best suited to differentiating between migraine and tension-type headache. Although not unexpected, given that the diagnosis of primary headache disorders in both diagnostic systems is based largely on the nature and quality of patient-reported symptoms, this finding suggests that migraine and tension-type headache are associated with different patterns of TCM diagnosis.

Primary headache disorders are often accompanied by neck pain or other symptoms referable to neck muscles. Therefore, physical therapy and other physical treatments are commonly prescribed for headache management. A medical literature review was completed in order to gather information regarding the efficacy of selected physical modalities in the treatment of primary and cervicogenic headache disorders. After analyzing the collected data, expert opinions were developed regarding the utility and efficacy of selected physical modalities in the management of primary and cervicogenic headaches. Based on this review, the following four expert opinions are presented: physical therapy is more effective than massage therapy or acupuncture for the treatment of tension-type headache and appears to be most beneficial for patients with a high frequency of headache attacks. Physical therapy is most effective for the treatment of migraine when combined with other treatments such as thermal biofeedback, relaxation training and exercise. Chiropractic manipulation demonstrated a trend towards benefit in the treatment of tension-type headache, but evidence is weak. Chiropractic manipulation is probably more effective in the treatment of tension-type headache than it is in the treatment of migraine. In general, strong evidence is lacking regarding the efficacy of these treatments in reducing headache frequency, intensity, duration and disability in many commonly encountered clinical situations. Many of the published case series and controlled studies are of low quality. Physical treatments are unlikely to pose a significant risk, with the exception of high velocity chiropractic manipulation of the neck. Consideration must be given to financial costs and lost treatment opportunity by prescribing potentially ineffective treatment. In the absence of clear evidence regarding their role in treatment, physicians and patients are advised to make cautious and individualized judgments about the utility of physical treatments for headache management. In most cases, the use of physical modalities should complement rather than replace better validated forms of therapy. The evidence base to determine the safety and efficacy of physical treatments in the management of headache disorders would be substantially improved by using standard scientific rigor in the development and conduct of future clinical studies.

Dental graduates often feel underprepared for independent practice, particularly in challenging work environments. This mixed-methods study explored self-perceived preparedness among final-year dental students, recent graduates, and house officers training for full registration in Karachi, Pakistan. This study correlated preparedness with personality type and aligned it with the Conscious Competence Model (CCM), which is comprised of four stages of learner self-perception as they proceed toward acquiring new competencies: Unconscious incompetent (don’t know what you don’t know); conscious incompetent (now aware of skill deficits); conscious competent (performs skill but with conscious effort and deep concentration); unconscious competent (performs with minimal conscious thought). A total of 44 participants (86% female, mean age 23.2 ± 3.43 years) completed the Dental Undergraduates Preparedness Assessment Scale (DU-PAS), with high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha: overall = 0.89, Part A = 0.91, Part B = 0.82). Thirty of these 44 participants also completed a Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) inventory, provided a global rating for self-perceived preparedness on a scale ranging from 0%–not ready to 100%–completely ready, and also engaged in semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using chi-squared, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests, while qualitative data (themes identified from interviews) were thematically analysed and mapped to the CCM. The mean overall DU-PAS score was 64.12 ± 5.18 (clinical skills 62.0 ± 5.04, non-clinical skills 65.95 ± 8.09). High confidence levels were reported for foundational skills, such as taking medical history (95%). Conversely, lower confidence was reported for specialised procedures, such as bitewing radiography (29.5%), and non-clinical skills, such as managing pediatric patients (25%) and anxious patients (31.8%). DU-PAS scores demonstrated a significant decline across training stages. Final-year students scored highest (67.9 ± 4.2), followed by house officers (62.4 ± 3.5), and recent graduates (59.4 ± 4.8). The differences were statistically significant (H(2) = 18.42, Kruskal–Wallis p < 0.001), indicating a progressive reduction in perceived preparedness with increasing training experience. Of the 30 participants who completed the MBTI, 60% were classified as extroverts, who reported a median global self-perceived preparedness score of 70% on the 0–100 scale, compared with a median score of 57% among introverts. Six themes were identified from the interviews: effective undergraduate experiences, deliberate professional development, patient care, emergency preparedness, practice management, and ethical reflection were identified that charted movement from unconscious to conscious incompetence once graduates faced real clinical demands. Although participants felt that basic skills contributed to some preparedness to practice, they did not feel equipped to manage complex clinical and managerial tasks. In relation to the CCM learning process, the progressively declining preparedness rankings among final year students, house officers and recent graduates suggests that the transition from unconscious to conscious incompetence did not occur until entering professional practice. Possible interventions were suggested by identifying enablers and barriers to preparedness. These include increased earlier supervised exposure to advanced endodontics, radiography, paediatric and anxious-patient care, along with structured modules in practice management and reflective mentoring, leading to consolidating conscious competence before graduation.

Background: Headache disorders, particularly migraine, are a leading cause of disability among active-duty military personnel, significantly affecting operational readiness and fitness for duty. Despite their high prevalence, limited data exist on how headache disorders are managed within military primary care systems. This study aimed to evaluate diagnostic confidence, treatment strategies, and structural challenges in the management of headache disorders from the perspective of military primary care physicians. Methods: A prospective, nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted between May and July 2023 among all active-duty military physicians in primary care roles. An anonymous 15-item questionnaire assessed diagnostic practices, therapeutic approaches, referral pathways, perceived knowledge gaps, and suggestions for system improvements. The survey was distributed across military medical centers and outpatient clinics in Germany. Results: Ninety military physicians participated. Migraine and tension-type headache were commonly encountered, with 70% having treated at least one headache patient in the week prior to the survey. Diagnostic confidence was high for migraine (83.4%) and tension-type headache (77.8%) but lower for medication-overuse headache (65.5%) and cluster headache (47.8%). Acute treatment was widely implemented, but only 27.8% of respondents regularly initiated preventive therapies. Awareness of clinical guidelines was limited: only 23.3% were familiar with the ICHD-3, and just 58.9% with national headache treatment guidelines. Respondents expressed strong demand for targeted education, practical diagnostic tools, and improved interdisciplinary coordination. Conclusions: Headache disorders are a prevalent and clinically significant issue in military primary care. While military physicians show high engagement, important gaps exist in preventive treatment, guideline familiarity, and access to specialist care. Structured training, standardized treatment protocols, and system-level improvements are essential to optimize headache care and maintain operational readiness.

Patients suffering from headache are usually asked to use charts to allow monitoring of their disease. These diaries, providing they are regularly filled in, become crucial in the diagnosis and management of headache disorders because they provide further information on attack frequency and temporal pattern, drug intake, trigger factors, and short-/long-term responses to treatment. Electronic tools could facilitate diary monitoring and thus the management of headaches. Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a chronic and disabling condition that can be treated by withdrawing the overused drug(s) and adopting specific approaches that focus on the development of a close doctor–patient relationship in the post-withdrawal phase. Although the headache diary is, in this context, an essential tool for the constant, reliable monitoring of these patients to prevent relapses, very little is known about the applicability of electronic diaries in MOH patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acceptability of and patient compliance with an electronic headache diary (palm device) as compared with a traditional diary chart in a group of headache inpatients with MOH. A palm diary device, developed in accordance with the ICHD-II criteria, was given to 85 MOH inpatients during the detoxification phase. On the first day of hospitalization, the patients were instructed in the use of the diary and were then required to fill it in daily for the following 7 days. Data on the patients’ opinions on the electronic diary and the instructions given, its screen and layout, as well as its convenience and ease of use, in comparison with the traditional paper version, were collected using a numerical rating scale. A total of 504 days with headache were recorded in both the electronic and the traditional headache diaries simultaneously. The level of patient compliance was good. The patients appreciated the electronic headache diary, deeming it easy to understand and to use (fill in); most of the patients rated the palm device handier than the traditional paper version.