Abstract

STUDY QUESTIONWhat is the relationship between children's thoughts and feelings about their donor and their security of attachment to their solo mothers in middle childhood?SUMMARY ANSWERChildren with higher levels of secure–autonomous attachment to their mothers were more likely to have positive perceptions of the donor, and those with higher levels of insecure–disorganized attachment to their mothers were more likely to perceive him negatively.WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADYThere is limited understanding of the factors that contribute to children's thoughts and feelings about their donor in solo mother families. In adolescence, an association was found between adolescents’ curiosity about donor conception and their security of attachment to their mothers.STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION19 children were administered the Friends and Family Interview and Donor Conception Interview between December 2015 and March 2016 as part of the second phase of a longitudinal, multi-method, multi-informant study of solo mother families.PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODSAll children were aged between 7 and 13 years and had been conceived by donor insemination to solo mothers. Interviews were conducted in participants’ homes. The Friends and Family Interview was rated according to a standardized coding scheme designed to measure security of attachment in terms of secure–autonomous, insecure–dismissing, insecure–preoccupied and insecure–disorganized attachment patterns. Quantitative analyses of the Donor Conception Interview yielded two factors: interest in the donor and perceptions of the donor. Qualitative analyses of the Donor Conception Interview were conducted using qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis.MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCEStatistically significant associations were found between the perception of the donor scale and the secure–autonomous and insecure–disorganized attachment ratings. Children with higher levels of secure–autonomous attachment to their mothers were more likely to have positive perceptions of the donor (r = 0.549, P = 0.015), and those with higher levels of insecure–disorganized attachment to their mothers were more likely to perceive him negatively (r = −0.632, P = 0.004). Children's narratives about the donor depicted him as a stranger (n = 8), a biological father (n = 4), a social parent (n = 3), or in ambivalent terms (n = 4).LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTIONFindings are limited by the wide age range of children within a small overall sample size. Participants were those willing and able to take part in research on donor conception families. The statistical significance of correlation coefficients was not corrected for multiple comparisons.WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGSFindings highlight the importance of situating children's ideas about the donor within family contexts. It is recommended that those working with donor conception families consider this when advising parents about whether, what and how to tell children about donor conception.STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)This study was funded by the Wellcome Trust [097857/Z/11/Z]. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Highlights

  • There has been a worldwide increase in the number of single women accessing fertility treatment with donated gametes (De Wert et al, 2014)

  • MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Statistically significant associations were found between the perception of the donor scale and the secure–autonomous and insecure–disorganized attachment ratings

  • Less is known about how parents and children in solo mother families think and feel about the sperm donors involved in family creation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There has been a worldwide increase in the number of single women accessing fertility treatment with donated gametes (De Wert et al, 2014). Most of the empirical research on this topic has focused on single women who used donor sperm in their path to parenthood This growing literature has generally shown that solo mother families do not differ in terms of family functioning or child adjustment from those headed by opposite-sex or same-sex couples (Chan et al, 1998; Murray and Golombok, 2005a,b; Golombok et al, 2016). In the US, anonymous donors have been found to be a symbolic presence within families (Hertz, 2006), while in the UK, it seems that some mothers prefer not to think about the donor, irrespective of whether he is anonymous or identifiable (Zadeh et al, 2016a) It appears that single mothers may be more likely than their partnered counterparts to have shared, or plan to share, information about donor conception with their child (Scheib et al, 2003; Freeman et al, 2016). Some studies have shown that single mothers incorporate the donor into their child’s ‘birth narrative’ (Hertz, 2006), while others have highlighted a tendency amongst mothers to postpone sharing this information (Landau and Weissenberg, 2010), and some uncertainty about doing so at all (Freeman et al, 2016)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.